Figures & data
Figure 2 Average loss of thickness by abrasion Δl (cm) vs. replacement ratio (%). (a) Rosa (Citation2002), (b) Matias and de Brito (Citation2005), (c) Evangelista (Citation2007) and (d) Fonseca (Citation2009). OEC, outer environment; LCC, laboratory conditions; WCC, wet chamber; WIC, water immersion.
![Figure 2 Average loss of thickness by abrasion Δl (cm) vs. replacement ratio (%). (a) Rosa (Citation2002), (b) Matias and de Brito (Citation2005), (c) Evangelista (Citation2007) and (d) Fonseca (Citation2009). OEC, outer environment; LCC, laboratory conditions; WCC, wet chamber; WIC, water immersion.](/cms/asset/81b9d375-e661-4c11-90a6-ffa6a1f44bc8/tsue_a_425645_o_f0002g.gif)
Table 1 Densities (D) and water absorptions (WA) of the aggregates used.
Figure 3 Ratio of concrete abrasion mass losses (Δl RAC/Δl RC) between RAC and RC vs. the ratio of the densities D (a) and water absorptions WA, (b) of the mixture of aggregates (Fonseca Citation2009).
![Figure 3 Ratio of concrete abrasion mass losses (Δl RAC/Δl RC) between RAC and RC vs. the ratio of the densities D (a) and water absorptions WA, (b) of the mixture of aggregates (Fonseca Citation2009).](/cms/asset/1efa77be-9ba1-44ae-9ffb-381ff92579a0/tsue_a_425645_o_f0003g.gif)