509
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Carbon footprint comparison of sign substrate made from recycled e-waste plastic versus aluminium

, , , &
Pages 76-83 | Received 10 Dec 2010, Accepted 29 Jun 2011, Published online: 18 Jul 2011

Figures & data

Figure 1 Aluminium sign substrate used in the USA.

Figure 1 Aluminium sign substrate used in the USA.

Table 1 CF calculators.

Figure 2 Manufacturing process flow diagram of recycled e-waste plastic material.

Figure 2 Manufacturing process flow diagram of recycled e-waste plastic material.

Table 2 Data collection results of the DRM substrate.

Table 3 Data collection results of the aluminium substrate.

Figure 3 IO of the blend process model.

Figure 3 IO of the blend process model.

Figure 4 IO of the US power grid model.

Figure 4 IO of the US power grid model.

Figure 5 LCA model for the recycled material.

Figure 5 LCA model for the recycled material.

Table 4 Inventory analysis results of the DRM and aluminium substrates.

Figure 6 Total CF of various materials.

Figure 6 Total CF of various materials.

Figure 7 CF curve with the ratio of primary plastic.

Figure 7 CF curve with the ratio of primary plastic.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.