Saving energy in the workplace: evidence from Cambodia

Figures & data

Table 1. Factor loadings, reliability, and validity.

Constructs	Loadings
Attitude towards energy saving (AT) (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.804, CR = 0.872, AVE = 0.629)
AT1-It is important for my organisation to save energy to protect the environment	0.811
AT2-The reduction of carbon emissions in my organisation is dependent on saving energy	0.770
AT3-It is crucial to save energy in my organisation to address energy shortages	0.791
AT4-Energy savings in my organisation are a wise decision	0.801
Subjective norm (SN) (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.820, CR = 0.876, AVE = 0.641)
SN1-My colleagues think that I should save energy in my organisation	0.895
SN2-My managers think that I should save energy in my organisation	0.683
SN3-My manager would like me to save energy in my organisation	0.829
SN4-Those who are important to me believe that I need to save energy in my organisation	0.782
Perceived behaviour control (PB) (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.768, CR = 0.848, AVE = 0.582)
PB1-I think that saving energy in my organisation is an easy task	0.763
PB2-I know how to save the energy within my organisation	0.728
PB3-Saving energy is the entire of my choice	0.736
PB4-If wanted to; I could save energy at work	0.822
Personal moral norm (MN) (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.776, CR = 0.856, AVE = 0.598)
PMN1-It is my moral responsibility to save the energy within my organisation	0.768
MN2-I have a moral obligation to reduce energy consumption in my organisation	0.801
MN3-I would be disappointed if I did not make energy-saving in my organisation	0.713
MN4-The failure to save energy in my organisation would violate my moral convictions	0.808
Energy saving intention (IN) (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.847, CR = 0.897, AVE = 0.687)
IN1-I am willing to save energy in my organisation	0.850
IN2-I intend to participate in energy-saving efforts in my organisation	0.844
IN3-I will strive to save energy in my organisation	0.741
IN4-I aim to save energy at work regularly if required	0.873

Table 2. Discriminant validity-fornell & larcker criterion.

	AT	IN	PB	MN	SN
AT	0.793
IN	0.469	0.829
PB	0.368	0.751	0.763
MN	0.111	0.395	0.377	0.774
SN	0.238	0.471	0.433	0.492	0.801
HTMT
AT
IN	0.567
PB	0.435	0.886
MN	0.140	0.479	0.480
SN	0.258	0.508	0.497	0.595

Table 3. Hypotheses testing.

	Path coefficient	SD	t-value	p-value	Decision
AT -> IN	0.215	0.043	4.965	0.000	Supported
SN -> IN	0.121	0.043	2.809	0.005	Supported
PB -> IN	0.586	0.036	16.470	0.000	Supported
MN -> IN	0.090	0.045	2.017	0.044	Supported

R² = 0.633, Q² = 0.428