Figures & data
Figure 1. Overview of the NTERM conjugation method. (a) Schematic diagram of NTERM-conjugated ADC. (b) Chemical structure of the aldehyde-tagged MMAF (ald-MMAF). (c) Schematic representation of the NTERM conjugation reaction
![Figure 1. Overview of the NTERM conjugation method. (a) Schematic diagram of NTERM-conjugated ADC. (b) Chemical structure of the aldehyde-tagged MMAF (ald-MMAF). (c) Schematic representation of the NTERM conjugation reaction](/cms/asset/766f0aa5-2aa5-42c3-a407-c1927cce87d6/kmab_a_1914885_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. LC/MS analysis of NTERM conjugate. (a) DAR profile of T-N-F. T-N-F was analyzed using Waters Synapt G-2 system after deglycosylation reaction. Species with DAR 0–DAR 7 were observed and marked at D0–D7. The apparent DAR is 3.2 that is calculated as the weighted-average of DAR. (b) Conjugation sites were identified by peptide mapping. Trypsin-treated trastuzumab (top) and T-N-F (down) fragments mixture were resolved using an UPLC system with ACQUITY UPLC PST (BEH) C18 column
![Figure 2. LC/MS analysis of NTERM conjugate. (a) DAR profile of T-N-F. T-N-F was analyzed using Waters Synapt G-2 system after deglycosylation reaction. Species with DAR 0–DAR 7 were observed and marked at D0–D7. The apparent DAR is 3.2 that is calculated as the weighted-average of DAR. (b) Conjugation sites were identified by peptide mapping. Trypsin-treated trastuzumab (top) and T-N-F (down) fragments mixture were resolved using an UPLC system with ACQUITY UPLC PST (BEH) C18 column](/cms/asset/6cec50ed-84d7-40cf-a9e9-73f552cd6c74/kmab_a_1914885_f0002_oc.jpg)
Table 1. Conjugation sites identified by peptide mapping
Table 2. Binding affinity and kinetics parameter of trastuzumab and trastuzumab-MMAF conjugates against HER2
Table 3. In vitro stability of ADCs in serum samples
Table 4. Pharmacokinetic parameters of trastuzumab and MMAF-conjugated ADCs
Figure 3. Pharmacokinetic profile of ADCs, synthesized with different conjugation techniques, in rats at a single dose of 2.5 mg/kg. (a) Overview of the total antibody concentration of ADCs. (b) Overview of the conjugated antibody concentration. Blue line represents T-N-F, whereas T-C-F, T-K-F, and trastuzumab are represented by red, green and magenta lines, respectively. (c) Overview of the total and conjugated antibody concentration profiles of T-N-F (left), T-C-F (middle), and T-K-F (right). Blue lines denote total mAb and red lines represent ADC. N = 5 and the error bars represent standard error
![Figure 3. Pharmacokinetic profile of ADCs, synthesized with different conjugation techniques, in rats at a single dose of 2.5 mg/kg. (a) Overview of the total antibody concentration of ADCs. (b) Overview of the conjugated antibody concentration. Blue line represents T-N-F, whereas T-C-F, T-K-F, and trastuzumab are represented by red, green and magenta lines, respectively. (c) Overview of the total and conjugated antibody concentration profiles of T-N-F (left), T-C-F (middle), and T-K-F (right). Blue lines denote total mAb and red lines represent ADC. N = 5 and the error bars represent standard error](/cms/asset/b35bc7d8-4243-4647-8f8d-394cd44b0134/kmab_a_1914885_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. (a) Weight change of rats after administering a single dose of test samples. The numbers of survived animals are indicated on the right. (b) Dose-related hepatotoxicity induced by ADCs. AST and ALT activity in rat serum were assessed at day 5 after ADC administration. Each point denotes the average value obtained from five animals. Box plots denote mean value and 25–75% quartile
![Figure 4. (a) Weight change of rats after administering a single dose of test samples. The numbers of survived animals are indicated on the right. (b) Dose-related hepatotoxicity induced by ADCs. AST and ALT activity in rat serum were assessed at day 5 after ADC administration. Each point denotes the average value obtained from five animals. Box plots denote mean value and 25–75% quartile](/cms/asset/1f05dbe3-2086-40f0-b84c-a36f9fbd1de6/kmab_a_1914885_f0004_oc.jpg)
Table 5. Hematological analysis of rat blood on day 5 and day 12 after administration of test samples
Figure 5. In vivo efficacy of ADCs in nude rat xenograft model. (a) Tumor growth curves of 1 mg/kg ADC-treated groups and PBS- or trastuzumab-treated groups. Tumor volume was calculated as 0.5 × (longest axis) × (shortest axis)2. N = 6, and the error bar represents the standard error. (b) Survival plots of 1 mg/kg ADC-treated groups and the control groups. Animals were removed from the study when their tumor size became 200%. (c) Tumor growth curve of 2.5 mg/kg ADC-treated groups. A single dose was intravenously injected on day 0
![Figure 5. In vivo efficacy of ADCs in nude rat xenograft model. (a) Tumor growth curves of 1 mg/kg ADC-treated groups and PBS- or trastuzumab-treated groups. Tumor volume was calculated as 0.5 × (longest axis) × (shortest axis)2. N = 6, and the error bar represents the standard error. (b) Survival plots of 1 mg/kg ADC-treated groups and the control groups. Animals were removed from the study when their tumor size became 200%. (c) Tumor growth curve of 2.5 mg/kg ADC-treated groups. A single dose was intravenously injected on day 0](/cms/asset/76cc7f17-27ba-428b-8d5c-bc2aa454ccea/kmab_a_1914885_f0005_oc.jpg)