522
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research articles

Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas mitigation of production and use of bio-methane: sensitivity of effects from N2O emissions

Pages 257-267 | Received 14 Oct 2009, Accepted 18 Feb 2010, Published online: 18 Aug 2010

Figures & data

Table 1. Input data for the LCA for the plant configuration types: state of the art and optimized technology.

Figure 1. The bio-methane process chain.

Figure 1. The bio-methane process chain.

Figure 2. GHG factors of the process chain bio-methane: sensitivity analysis. Variant 1: increased methane leakage in reactor (1.5% instead of 1%); Variant 2: increased methane slip in PSA (no after treatment, slip of 2% instead of 0.01%); Variant 3: digestate storage not completely covered – moderate emissions of 2.5% of gas stored. Red line: GHG emissions of natural gas.

Figure 2. GHG factors of the process chain bio-methane: sensitivity analysis. Variant 1: increased methane leakage in reactor (1.5% instead of 1%); Variant 2: increased methane slip in PSA (no after treatment, slip of 2% instead of 0.01%); Variant 3: digestate storage not completely covered – moderate emissions of 2.5% of gas stored. Red line: GHG emissions of natural gas.

Figure 3. GHG balance of bio-methane from different substrates in regionally adjusted crop rotation systems

Figure 3. GHG balance of bio-methane from different substrates in regionally adjusted crop rotation systems

Figure 4. Sensitivity analysis: effects of different assumptions of N2O emissions to the overall GHG balance in the state-of-the-art biogas plant. Variant 1: increased methane leakage in reactor (1.5% instead of 1%); Variant 2: increased methane slip in PSA (no after treatment, slip of 2% instead of 0.01%); Variant 3: digestate storage not completely covered – moderate emissions of 2.5% of gas stored. Red line: GHG emissions of natural gas.

Figure 4. Sensitivity analysis: effects of different assumptions of N2O emissions to the overall GHG balance in the state-of-the-art biogas plant. Variant 1: increased methane leakage in reactor (1.5% instead of 1%); Variant 2: increased methane slip in PSA (no after treatment, slip of 2% instead of 0.01%); Variant 3: digestate storage not completely covered – moderate emissions of 2.5% of gas stored. Red line: GHG emissions of natural gas.

Table 2. Composition of biogas substrates at the five locations.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.