1,953
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research articles

Review of trade-offs and co-benefits from greenhouse gas mitigation measures in agricultural production

, , &
Pages 147-157 | Received 11 Nov 2011, Accepted 29 May 2012, Published online: 29 Jun 2012

Figures & data

Figure 1. Impact of different constraints on reducing GHG mitigation potential from its theoretical biological maximum to lower, realistically achievable potentials. Source: Smith et al. (2005).

Figure 1. Impact of different constraints on reducing GHG mitigation potential from its theoretical biological maximum to lower, realistically achievable potentials. Source: Smith et al. (2005).

Figure 2. Different categories of trade-offs or co-benefits that have to be identified and assessed to come to a good mitigation measure. Note: Land use includes land use per se, plus direct and indirect land-use change.

Figure 2. Different categories of trade-offs or co-benefits that have to be identified and assessed to come to a good mitigation measure. Note: Land use includes land use per se, plus direct and indirect land-use change.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.