2,494
Views
252
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A survey of bisphenol A and other bisphenol analogues in foodstuffs from nine cities in China

&
Pages 319-329 | Received 29 Oct 2013, Accepted 19 Nov 2013, Published online: 30 Jan 2014
 

Abstract

Bisphenol A (BPA) is a high-production-volume chemical that is widely used in polycarbonate plastics and epoxy food-can coatings. Following several studies that have reported adverse effects of BPA over the past decade, other bisphenol analogues, such as bisphenol F (BPF), bisphenol S (BPS), bisphenol AF (BPAF), and bisphenol B (BPB), have been gradually developed as substitutes for BPA in several applications. Nevertheless, few studies have reported on the occurrence of compounds other than BPA in foodstuffs. In this study, 289 food samples (13 categories: cereals and cereal products, meat and meat products, fish and seafood, eggs, milk and milk products, bean products, fruits, vegetables, cookies/snacks, beverages, cooking oils, condiments, and others), collected from nine cities in China, were analysed for eight bisphenol analogues using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). BPA and BPF were found widely in foodstuffs at concentrations ranging from below the limit of quantitation (LOQ) to 299 ng g–1 (mean = 4.94 ng g–1) and from below the LOQ to 623 ng g–1 (mean = 2.50 ng g–1), fresh weight, respectively. The highest total concentrations of bisphenols (∑BPs: sum of eight bisphenols) were found in the category of vegetables that included canned products (mean = 27.0 ng g–1), followed by fish and seafood (16.5 ng g–1) and beverages (15.6 ng g–1). ∑BP concentrations (mean = 2–3 ng g–1) in milk and milk products, cooking oils, and eggs were low. Food samples sold in metallic cans contained higher mean ∑BP concentrations (56.9 ng g–1) in comparison with those packaged in glass (0.43 ng g–1), paper (11.9 ng g–1), or plastic (6.40 ng g–1). The daily dietary intakes of bisphenols were estimated, based on the mean concentrations measured and daily consumption rates of foods, to be 646 and 664 ng kg–1 bw day–1 for men and women, respectively.

Graphical Abstract

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Professor Shushen Liu (Tongji University), Dr Kegang Zhang (Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, CAS), Dr Zhenhua Wang (Shandong Analysis and Test Center), and Dr Zongyan Cui (Hebei Entry–Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau) for help with the collection of samples.

Funding

This study was funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, Atlanta, GA, USA) [grant number 1U38EH000464-01] to the Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the CDC.

Supplementary material

For supplementary material, see http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2013.868611.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 799.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.