234
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Analysis of four polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in plant-based food supplements—results of a collaborative study

& ORCID Icon
Pages 1380-1389 | Received 06 Mar 2022, Accepted 17 May 2022, Published online: 07 Jun 2022
 

Abstract

The determination of carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in food supplements is challenging, especially due to the presence of other e.g. heterogeneous PAH-like compounds in the matrix. A collaborative study with 12 participants was conducted in order to assess performance characteristics of a fast method intended to analyse the four regulated PAHs (PAH 4) benzo[b]fluoranthene [BbF], benz[a]anthracene [BaA], chrysene [CHR] and benzo[a]pyrene [BaP] in five different plant-based food supplements in the form of capsules, powder, and tablets. The principle of the method includes the extraction of PAHs with ethyl acetate: cyclohexane followed by a two-step SPE cleanup and final analysis by GC-MS or LC-FLD. The regulated maximum level for BaP is 10 µg/kg and, for the PAH 4, 50 µg/kg. Accordingly, the method was validated for the regulated PAH 4 analytically challenging concentration range from 2.5 µg/kg to 6.9 µg/kg. The performance criteria for the method set in European Regulation No 333/2007 for the overall repeatability, reproducibility (HorRat values below 2), and recovery (range 50–120%) were fulfilled. Based on the statistical evaluation of the results, it was concluded that the method is a suitable alternative to existing methods and should be studied for additional matrices.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank laboratory technician Riuyinosa Igbinovia for laboratory assistance on homogeneity tests, consultant Mikael Pedersen for availability on questions regarding statistic data handling, and Professor Jens Jørgen Sloth for inspiration to ring-trial setup and reporting. All participating laboratories are thanked for their voluntary participation in the collaborative trial and comments to the method.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

Parts of this work were included in the European Reference Laboratory for Processing Contaminants [EURL-PC, SI2.802033].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 799.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.