17
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

MT-Keyboard: A Bayesian Model-assisted Interval Design to Account for Toxicity Grades and Types for Phase I Trials

, & ORCID Icon
Received 30 Jan 2023, Accepted 16 Apr 2024, Accepted author version posted online: 26 Jun 2024
 
Accepted author version

Abstract

Conventionally, dose finding trials are based on dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) that only captures the most severe toxicities, e.g., treatment related grade 3 or higher toxicity according to the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. However, this approach is often problematic for certain novel targeted therapies and immunotherapies, which may not induce DLT within a clinically active dose range and are often characterized by low grade toxicities. This important issue has been highlighted and discussed in the American Statistical Association (ASA) Biopharmaceutical (BIOP) Section Open Forums, and is also an important consideration of the Project Optimus initiated by FDA to “reform the dose optimization and dose selection paradigm in oncology drug development.” In this paper, we propose an easy-to-implement model-assisted Bayesian design, known as multiple toxicity keyboard (MT-Keyboard) design, to incorporate toxicity grades and types into dose finding. The MT-Keyboard design is able to accommodate binary, quasi-binary and continuous toxicity endpoints that are constructed to account for toxicity grades and types. We further extend the MT-Keyboard design, referred to as TITE-MT-Keyboard, to accommodate late-onset toxicity using the approximated likelihood approach. Simulation shows that the MT-Keyboard and TITE-MT-Keyboard designs have desirable operating characteristics, comparable to or better than some existing designs. A web-based software to implement the design will be freely available at www.trialdesign.org.

Disclaimer

As a service to authors and researchers we are providing this version of an accepted manuscript (AM). Copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proofs will be undertaken on this manuscript before final publication of the Version of Record (VoR). During production and pre-press, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal relate to these versions also.

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 71.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.