985
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Size dependence of twin formation energy of metallic nanowires

, &
Pages 112-118 | Received 01 Jun 2012, Accepted 02 Sep 2012, Published online: 01 Oct 2012

Figures & data

Figure 1. Schematic of the simulation cell of a <111> nanowire with a circular cross section (a) and a hexagonal cross section (b). Blue (dark) spheres represent atoms at twin boundaries and gray spheres represent atoms in an FCC structure.

Figure 1. Schematic of the simulation cell of a <111> nanowire with a circular cross section (a) and a hexagonal cross section (b). Blue (dark) spheres represent atoms at twin boundaries and gray spheres represent atoms in an FCC structure.

Figure 2. Twin formation energy γ t as a function of nanowire diameter d for both circular and hexagonal cross sections. The dashed lines show the bulk values γbulk and the solid lines represent theory (discussed in Section 3).

Figure 2. Twin formation energy γ t as a function of nanowire diameter d for both circular and hexagonal cross sections. The dashed lines show the bulk values γbulk and the solid lines represent theory (discussed in Section 3).

Figure 3. Twin formation energy of individual shells as a function of radial coordinate r. The dashed lines represent the twin formation energies in the bulk.

Figure 3. Twin formation energy of individual shells as a function of radial coordinate r. The dashed lines represent the twin formation energies in the bulk.

Figure 4. (a) Twin formation energy of individual shells as a function of radial coordinate r and (b) comparison of theory and simulation results. The dashed lines represent the twin formation energies in the bulk.

Figure 4. (a) Twin formation energy of individual shells as a function of radial coordinate r and (b) comparison of theory and simulation results. The dashed lines represent the twin formation energies in the bulk.