6,679
Views
42
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Silicone rubbers for dielectric elastomers with improved dielectric and mechanical properties as a result of substituting silica with titanium dioxide

&
Pages 268-289 | Received 19 Sep 2015, Accepted 09 Nov 2015, Published online: 08 Dec 2015

Figures & data

Figure 1. Tensile stress–strain, breakdown strength and actuation measurements.

Figure 1. Tensile stress–strain, breakdown strength and actuation measurements.

Figure 2. Thermal degradation analysis of the LSR and RTV films.

Figure 2. Thermal degradation analysis of the LSR and RTV films.

Table 1. Thermal properties of the LSR and RTV films.

Figure 3. Breakdown strength versus filler content as determined from the TGA of LSR and RTV films. All films are of similar thickness (60–80 μm).

Figure 3. Breakdown strength versus filler content as determined from the TGA of LSR and RTV films. All films are of similar thickness (60–80 μm).

Table 2. Weibull analysis parameters for LSR and RTV samples.

Figure 4. Tear strength of the LSR and RTV films. The results are summarized in .

Figure 4. Tear strength of the LSR and RTV films. The results are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3. The mechanical properties of LSR and RTV films.

Figure 5. Dynamic viscosity of the XLR–TiO2 mixtures at 23°C.

Figure 5. Dynamic viscosity of the XLR–TiO2 mixtures at 23°C.

Figure 6. Frequency-dependent relative permittivity spectra of the pure XLR and XLR–TiO2 elastomers at 23°C.

Figure 6. Frequency-dependent relative permittivity spectra of the pure XLR and XLR–TiO2 elastomers at 23°C.

Figure 7. Frequency-dependent dielectrical loss tangent spectra of the pure XLR and XLR–TiO2 elastomers at 23°C. The observed relaxations are Maxwell relaxations.

Figure 7. Frequency-dependent dielectrical loss tangent spectra of the pure XLR and XLR–TiO2 elastomers at 23°C. The observed relaxations are Maxwell relaxations.

Figure 8. Tear strength of the pure XLR and XLR–TiO2 elastomers.

Figure 8. Tear strength of the pure XLR and XLR–TiO2 elastomers.

Figure 9. Stress and elongation at breaking in the tear experiment on the pure XLR and XLR–TiO2 elastomers.

Figure 9. Stress and elongation at breaking in the tear experiment on the pure XLR and XLR–TiO2 elastomers.

Figure 10. SEM images of R420 TiO2 filler (a), pure XLR film (b) and XLR+35 wt.% R420 TiO2 film (c).

Figure 10. SEM images of R420 TiO2 filler (a), pure XLR film (b) and XLR+35 wt.% R420 TiO2 film (c).

Table 4. Mechanical properties and breakdown strength of the XLR–TiO2 films. The optimum of a given property is marked in gray.

Figure 11. 3D plot of breakdown strength as a function of the Young’s modulus and filler amount for the XLR–TiO2 (R420) films and the pure LSRs.

Figure 11. 3D plot of breakdown strength as a function of the Young’s modulus and filler amount for the XLR–TiO2 (R420) films and the pure LSRs.

Figure 12. 3D plot of breakdown strength as a function of the Young’s modulus and filler amount for the MJK 4/13-TiO2 (T805) films.

Figure 12. 3D plot of breakdown strength as a function of the Young’s modulus and filler amount for the MJK 4/13-TiO2 (T805) films.

Table 5. Weibull analysis parameters for XLR–TiO2 and RTV–TiO2 samples.

Table 6. Dielectric and mechanical performances and figures of merit (Fom) of the LSR–TiO2 and RTV–TiO2 formulations. Optimal properties are marked in gray.

Figure 13. Actuation curves for pure XLR and XLR+35 wt.% TiO2 films at 23°C.

Figure 13. Actuation curves for pure XLR and XLR+35 wt.% TiO2 films at 23°C.