Figures & data
Table 1. The zeta value of SiO2, SiO2–NH2, and GO.
Figure 2. The SEM images of (a) pristine SiO2 (b) GO@SiO2 hybrid; (c)TEM; and (d) HRTEM of GO@SiO2 hybrid.
![Figure 2. The SEM images of (a) pristine SiO2 (b) GO@SiO2 hybrid; (c)TEM; and (d) HRTEM of GO@SiO2 hybrid.](/cms/asset/098e23d1-3ef7-45ab-8827-75471f583cae/tsnm_a_1130757_f0002_b.gif)
Table 2. The element analysis of SiO2, SiO2–NH2, GO@SiO2, and GO.
Table 3. The element analysis of GO and in situ thermal reduction of graphene.
Figure 7. The SEM figures of fracture surfaces of RGO@SiO2/PDMS composites with different filler content (a, b) 30 phr (c, d) 60 phr.
![Figure 7. The SEM figures of fracture surfaces of RGO@SiO2/PDMS composites with different filler content (a, b) 30 phr (c, d) 60 phr.](/cms/asset/b78dcae4-8dbc-49eb-a573-9169a63c90ff/tsnm_a_1130757_f0007_c.jpg)
Table 4. The conductivity of RGO@SiO2/PDMS composites.
Table 5. The electromechanical properties of RGO@SiO2/PDMS composites.
Table 6. Comparison of actuated performances of advanced DE composites.
Figure 10. Lateral actuation strain of PDMS and RGO@SiO2/PDMS composites as a function of electric field.
![Figure 10. Lateral actuation strain of PDMS and RGO@SiO2/PDMS composites as a function of electric field.](/cms/asset/d8e307ff-3504-4135-8028-5370f1839226/tsnm_a_1130757_f0010_c.jpg)