Figures & data
Table 1. Percentage of Sinai composite and simplex place-names.
Table 2. Percentage of composite place-names with definite generic terms (stage one) according to the geographical-based approach.
Table 3. Percentage of place-names with definite type (stage two) according to the geographical-based approach.
Table 4. List of reclassified place-names (stage two) according to the geographical-based approach.
Table 5. Percentage of place-names with definite type (stage three) according to the geographical-based approach.
Figure 4. Comparison between the three stages of toponyms classification (geographical-based classification).
![Figure 4. Comparison between the three stages of toponyms classification (geographical-based classification).](/cms/asset/d762f977-cfb5-4e8d-965a-2f324834b703/tagi_a_1501759_f0004_oc.jpg)
Table 6. Classification of some places based on their feature-type (geographical-based approach).
Table 7. Classification of Sinai place-names based on place-type (geographical-based approach).
Table 8. Different forms from the basic root (brq).
Table 9. Classification of Sinai place-names meanings according to the name-giving approach.
Table 10. Classification of mono-meaning Sinai place-names according to the name-giving approach.
Table 11. Classification of some places based on the meaning of the specific terms (name-giving approach).
Table 12. Classification of Sinai place-names specifics according to the name-giving approach.
Table 13. Examples of descriptive Sinai place-names (name-giving approach).
Table 14. Examples of historical and incident Sinai place-names (name-giving approach).
Table 15. Examples of personal names and development-oriented names (name-giving approach).