Figures & data
Table 1. Information on the species used in the modelling framework along with IUCN status.
Figure 1. Conceptual workflow of the species distribution modelling framework implemented in this study.
![Figure 1. Conceptual workflow of the species distribution modelling framework implemented in this study.](/cms/asset/58beb8fe-dea1-4e67-bc17-75023686ba9a/tagi_a_2226196_f0001_b.gif)
Figure 2. Species richness of flora of conservation concern projected into current and future scenarios (a-c). Distributions of sika deer (d-f), muntjac deer (g-i), Red deer (j-l) and Fallow deer (m-o).
![Figure 2. Species richness of flora of conservation concern projected into current and future scenarios (a-c). Distributions of sika deer (d-f), muntjac deer (g-i), Red deer (j-l) and Fallow deer (m-o).](/cms/asset/964900fe-1529-4a30-8e17-59f35c40c5d3/tagi_a_2226196_f0002_b.gif)
Table 2. Mean accuracy metrics for the nine iterations of the random forest models run per species. AUC=area under the curve. TSS=true skill statistics.
Table 3. The current, future RCP45 2050 and future RCP85 2050 range size for the four deer species and 13 flora species.
Table 4. The future RCP45 2050 overlap of the four Deer species in km2 and per cent with the 13 flora species.
Table 5. The future RCP85 2050 overlap of the four Deer species in km2 and per cent with the 13 flora species.