1,249
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Study on the seismic lethal level of buildings and seismic disaster risk in Guangzhou, China

, , , &
Pages 800-829 | Received 04 Nov 2021, Accepted 07 Feb 2022, Published online: 02 Mar 2022

Figures & data

Table 1. Data resource and description.

Figure 1. Results of the population grid distribution in the study area (0.1 km*0.1 km).

Figure 1. Results of the population grid distribution in the study area (0.1 km*0.1 km).

Figure 2. Technical process of the earthquake disaster risk assessment method based on the lethal level.

Figure 2. Technical process of the earthquake disaster risk assessment method based on the lethal level.

Table 2. Matrix based on the lethal level and intensity.

Table 3. The interval and influencing factors of the lethal level of buildings.

Figure 3. Distribution map of field survey points in Guangzhou city.

Figure 3. Distribution map of field survey points in Guangzhou city.

Table 4. Types and specific characteristics of buildings in Guangzhou.

Figure 4. Distribution of lethality levels based on field survey results.

Figure 4. Distribution of lethality levels based on field survey results.

Figure 5. The log cumulative normal distribution of the lethal level in urban and rural areas.

Figure 5. The log cumulative normal distribution of the lethal level in urban and rural areas.

Table 5. Calculation results of the lethal level in various townships in Guangzhou.

Figure 6. Fitting results of the overall lethal level of urban areas, rural areas and each town.

Figure 6. Fitting results of the overall lethal level of urban areas, rural areas and each town.

Figure 7. Grid assessment results of earthquake lethal risk in Guangzhou with different intensity (a: the risk result when the study area suffers from an intensity of VI; b: the risk result when the study area suffers from an intensity of VI; c: the risk result when the study area suffers from an intensity of VI; d: the risk result when the study area suffers from an intensity of VI; e: the risk result when the study area suffers from an intensity of VI; f: the risk result when the study area suffers from an intensity of VI).

Figure 7. Grid assessment results of earthquake lethal risk in Guangzhou with different intensity (a: the risk result when the study area suffers from an intensity of VI; b: the risk result when the study area suffers from an intensity of VI; c: the risk result when the study area suffers from an intensity of VI; d: the risk result when the study area suffers from an intensity of VI; e: the risk result when the study area suffers from an intensity of VI; f: the risk result when the study area suffers from an intensity of VI).

Figure 8. PGA distribution results in Guangzhou.

Figure 8. PGA distribution results in Guangzhou.

Figure 9. The grid distribution results of the mortality rate of various townships in Guangzhou.

Figure 9. The grid distribution results of the mortality rate of various townships in Guangzhou.

Figure 10. Grid assessment results of earthquake lethal risk in Guangzhou.

Figure 10. Grid assessment results of earthquake lethal risk in Guangzhou.

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Chaoxu Xia, upon reasonable request.