234
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Dynamic mechanical properties and constitutive model for jointed mudstone samples subjected to cyclic loading

, , , ORCID Icon &
Pages 7240-7266 | Received 17 May 2021, Accepted 19 Sep 2021, Published online: 09 Oct 2021
 

Abstract

The dynamic properties of rocks are of great significance to the stability and safety of rock slopes and geological engineering under dynamic loads (e.g. seismic load). In this paper, triaxial cyclic tests were carried out on jointed mudstone samples with the prefabricated half-through joint, and their corresponding dynamic properties and deformation features are explored and analyzed in accordance with the hysteresis characteristics and the residual deformation forms. Moreover, based on the obtained fatigue properties under test conditions of diverse dip angles, confining pressures and dynamic stress, a dynamic stress ratio Rs is proposed, which gives a logarithmic correlation with the fatigue life of mudstone samples. Finally, on the basis of the breakage mechanics and homogenization theory, a dynamic binary-medium constitutive model is proposed, and the validations accompanied with the comparisons to test results are also given. It shows that this model can not only preferably duplicate the typical features of hysteresis loops and the gradually accumulation of the residual strain, but also gives a good consistence with the deformation features and fatigue life obtained from cyclic tests.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Figure A1. Comparisons of laboratory and computed results under confining pressure conditions for θ=15°: (a) Test No. D15-0, (b) Test No. D15-1, (c) Test No. D15-2.

Figure A1. Comparisons of laboratory and computed results under confining pressure conditions for θ=15°: (a) Test No. D15-0, (b) Test No. D15-1, (c) Test No. D15-2.

Figure A2. Comparisons of laboratory and computed results under confining pressure conditions for θ=30°: (a) Test No. D30-0, (b) Test No. D30-1, (c) Test No. D30-2.

Figure A2. Comparisons of laboratory and computed results under confining pressure conditions for θ=30°: (a) Test No. D30-0, (b) Test No. D30-1, (c) Test No. D30-2.

Data availability statement

All data, models generated or used during the study appear in the submitted article.

Additional information

Funding

The authors appreciate the funding of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41472296), the China Geological Survey (Grant No. CitationDD20190717), and Open Fund Research at the State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 229.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.