600
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Nordihydroguaiaretic acid suppresses the lipopolysaccharide-induced activation of macrophage through the down-regulation of TAK1

, , , &
Pages 15-22 | Received 29 Apr 2012, Accepted 25 Oct 2012, Published online: 30 Nov 2012

Figures & data

Figure 1.  NDGA blocked LPS-induced proinflammatory gene expression. (A–C) The expression of each gene in RAW264.7 cells was accessed using real-time PCR and the specific primers. The cells were pretreated with 10 µM NDGA for 24 hours, then challenged by LPS and cultured for 6 hour before the cell harvest. (D) The cells were transfected with pNF-κB-LUC and pRL-LUC, then 16 hours after transfection the cells were treated with 10 µM NDGA for 1 hour and subsequently stimulated with 100 ng/ml LPS for 3 hours. Firefly luciferase was normalized for Renilla luciferase activity.

Figure 1.  NDGA blocked LPS-induced proinflammatory gene expression. (A–C) The expression of each gene in RAW264.7 cells was accessed using real-time PCR and the specific primers. The cells were pretreated with 10 µM NDGA for 24 hours, then challenged by LPS and cultured for 6 hour before the cell harvest. (D) The cells were transfected with pNF-κB-LUC and pRL-LUC, then 16 hours after transfection the cells were treated with 10 µM NDGA for 1 hour and subsequently stimulated with 100 ng/ml LPS for 3 hours. Firefly luciferase was normalized for Renilla luciferase activity.

Figure 2.  NDGA down-regulates TAK1 protein level. (A) Dose-dependent decreases in TAK1 level following the challenge of NDGA. RAW264.7 cells were treated with the indicated concentration of NDGA for 6 hours, then harvested and subjected to the western blot analysis. (B) The decreases in TAK1 level were shown in various cell lines. Each cell line was treated with 10 µM NDGA for 6 hours and analyzed for TAK1 level.

Figure 2.  NDGA down-regulates TAK1 protein level. (A) Dose-dependent decreases in TAK1 level following the challenge of NDGA. RAW264.7 cells were treated with the indicated concentration of NDGA for 6 hours, then harvested and subjected to the western blot analysis. (B) The decreases in TAK1 level were shown in various cell lines. Each cell line was treated with 10 µM NDGA for 6 hours and analyzed for TAK1 level.

Figure 3.  Effect of NDGA on TAK1 mRNA level. NDGA had no negative effect on TAK1 mRNA levels. RAW264.7 cells were treated with 10 µM NDGA for indicated times and were analyzed the expression of TAK1 mRNA by real-time PCR. Each mRNA level was expressed by comparing with 1-hour control level.

Figure 3.  Effect of NDGA on TAK1 mRNA level. NDGA had no negative effect on TAK1 mRNA levels. RAW264.7 cells were treated with 10 µM NDGA for indicated times and were analyzed the expression of TAK1 mRNA by real-time PCR. Each mRNA level was expressed by comparing with 1-hour control level.

Figure 4.  The involvement of proteasome in the reduction of TAK1 protein level caused by NDGA treatment. RAW264.7 cells were treated with 10 µM NDGA for indicated times in the absence (A) or in the presence (B) of 500 nM MG132.

Figure 4.  The involvement of proteasome in the reduction of TAK1 protein level caused by NDGA treatment. RAW264.7 cells were treated with 10 µM NDGA for indicated times in the absence (A) or in the presence (B) of 500 nM MG132.

Figure 5.  The time-course of NDGA effect on TAK1 protein level and on the related signaling pathway. The changes in the degradation of IκBα and phosphorylation of JNK upon LPS treatment with the variation of NDGA pretreatment time in RAW264.7 cell. NDGA was pretreated for various times, followed by LPS treatment. The cells were treated with 100ng/ml LPS for 1 hour and harvested for the western blot analysis.

Figure 5.  The time-course of NDGA effect on TAK1 protein level and on the related signaling pathway. The changes in the degradation of IκBα and phosphorylation of JNK upon LPS treatment with the variation of NDGA pretreatment time in RAW264.7 cell. NDGA was pretreated for various times, followed by LPS treatment. The cells were treated with 100ng/ml LPS for 1 hour and harvested for the western blot analysis.

Figure 6.  Effect of NDGA and its structurally related chemicals on the TAK1 protein level. RAW264.7 cells were treated with each compound (see for the molecular structure) at 10 µM concentration for 6 hours and subjected to the western blot analysis.

Figure 6.  Effect of NDGA and its structurally related chemicals on the TAK1 protein level. RAW264.7 cells were treated with each compound (see Table 1 for the molecular structure) at 10 µM concentration for 6 hours and subjected to the western blot analysis.

Table 1. The molecular structure of NDGA and structurally related compounds that were used in .

Supplemental material

Supplementary content: AP-1 Reporter

Download JPEG Image (145.1 KB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.