Figures & data
Figure 1. Distribution of participants according to the 25(OH)D cut-off levels by gender (chi-square test was used for comparison between gender and vitamin D status categories).
![Figure 1. Distribution of participants according to the 25(OH)D cut-off levels by gender (chi-square test was used for comparison between gender and vitamin D status categories).](/cms/asset/054235b2-cefd-459f-beae-058ba7ab51e0/zljm_a_1502028_f0001_b.gif)
Figure 2. Percentage distribution of female participants according to 25(OH)D level and age groups (chi-square test was used for comparison between age groups and vitamin D status categories).
![Figure 2. Percentage distribution of female participants according to 25(OH)D level and age groups (chi-square test was used for comparison between age groups and vitamin D status categories).](/cms/asset/d386f4b8-a6de-4cca-a49e-533c9d8a4c2f/zljm_a_1502028_f0002_b.gif)
Table 1. Anthropometric measurements of study participants (n = 316).
Table 2. Daily energy and nutrient intake assessed by the average of the repeated 24 HDR and LW-FFQ with correlations between the estimates by applying questionnaires among Libyan women.
Figure 3. Bland-Altman plot assessing the agreement between the LW-FFQ and the average of repeated 24 HDRs for estimation of vitamin D intake.
![Figure 3. Bland-Altman plot assessing the agreement between the LW-FFQ and the average of repeated 24 HDRs for estimation of vitamin D intake.](/cms/asset/821892d6-4e2e-4fe0-8a3a-75825a4c38d4/zljm_a_1502028_f0003_b.gif)
Table 3. Cross-classification of vitamin D intake into quartiles by LW -FFQ and validation methods (24 HDR and status).
Table 4. Estimated vitamin D status (25(OH)D nmol/L) and vitamin D intake estimated by 24 HDR by quartile of vitamin D intake estimated by LW-FFQ among Libyan women (n = 40).
Table 5. Daily intake of food groups and their contribution to total Vitamin D intake among Libyan women (n = 316).
Table 6. Major vitamin D food sources assessed by 24 h recall.