Effects of music therapy on occupational stress and burn-out risk of operating room staff

Figures & data

Figure 1. Flowchart.

Table 1. Socio-professional characteristics and lifestyle habits of the study population.

Variables	Number	Percentage (%)
Marital status
Married	29	85.3
Single	3	8.8
Divorced	2	5.9
Tobacco smoking
Yes	5	14.7
No	29	85.3
Alcohol consumption
Yes	10	29.4
No	24	71.6
Physical activity
Yes	10	29.4
No	24	70.6
Coffee consumption
Neither or rarely	39	26.4
Frequently	14	41.2
Occupational status
Surgeon	8	23.5
Anesthetist doctor	21	5.9
Anesthetist technician	5	35.3
Nurse	6	14.7
Instrumentalist	6	17.6
Caregiver	1	2.9
Operating theatre
Urology	11	32.4
Maxillofacial surgery	9	26.5
Both	14	41.2
Another occupational activity
Yes	8	23.5
No	26	76.5
Effect size	34	100

Statical methods: numbers and percentages

Table 2. Burnout evaluation.

Settings of burnout		Number	Percentage (%)
Emotional exhaustion	Low	7	20,6
	Moderate	14	41,2
	High	13	38,2
Depersonalization	Low	11	32,4
	Moderate	6	17,6
	High	17	50
Professional achievement	Low	6	17,6
	Moderate	8	23,5
	High	20	58,8
Burnout level (High)	Yes	5	17,2
	No	24	82,8

Statical methods: numbers and percentages

Table 3. Evolution of perceived stress after intervention.

Variables		Before intervention Effect size (34)	After intervention Effect size (30)	p
		Number (percentage)	Number (percentage)
Stress level	Low	9 (37,5%)	15 (62,5%)	0,033
	Moderate	11 (50%)	11 (50%)
	High	14 (77,8%)	4 (22,2%)
Average score of perceived stress		Mean± Standard Deviation
		22 ± 8,8	16 ± 7,9	0,006

Statical methods: Snedecor ‘f’ test/Pearson Chi-square test

Table 4. Evolution of burnout after intervention.

Variables		Before intervention Effect size (34)	After intervention Effect size (30)	p
		Number (percentage)	Number (percentage)
Emotional exhaustion	<17	7 (29,2%)	17 (70,8%)	0,011
	18–29	14 (70%)	6 (30%)
	≥ 30	13 (65%)	7 (35%)
Depersonalization	< 5	11(57,9%)	8 (42,1%)	0,5
	6–11	6 (40%)	9 (60%)
	≥ 12	17 (56,7%)	13 (43,3%
Professional achievement	≥ 40	6 (46,2%)	7 (53,8%)	0,73
	34–39	8 (61,5%)	5 (38,5%)
	≤ 33	20 (52,6%)	18 (47,4%)
Burnout level	High	5 (17,2%)	3 (15%)	0,98
	Low-Moderate	24 (82,8%)	17 (85%)

Statical methods: Pearson Chi-square test