1,218
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

Analysis of the aerodynamic impact of the dispenser stance for the separation of cluster munitions

, , &
Pages 427-440 | Received 07 Dec 2015, Accepted 27 Apr 2016, Published online: 14 Jun 2016

Figures & data

Table 1. Computational parameters.

Figure 1. Pressure contours in the initial position.

Figure 1. Pressure contours in the initial position.

Figure 2. Separation trajectory of the store.

Figure 2. Separation trajectory of the store.

Figure 3. Comparison of the center of gravity over time for the simulated and experimental results.

Figure 3. Comparison of the center of gravity over time for the simulated and experimental results.

Figure 4. Comparison of the angular orientation over time for the simulated and experimental results.

Figure 4. Comparison of the angular orientation over time for the simulated and experimental results.

Figure 5. Model of cluster munitions.

Figure 5. Model of cluster munitions.

Figure 6. Computational model of the submunition.

Figure 6. Computational model of the submunition.

Figure 7. Local mesh for the submunition.

Figure 7. Local mesh for the submunition.

Figure 8. Volume mesh for the calculation area.

Figure 8. Volume mesh for the calculation area.

Table 2. Computational conditions.

Figure 9. Photograph of the experimental model.

Figure 9. Photograph of the experimental model.

Figure 10. Schlieren photograph of the experimental model in position 1, for Ma = 3 and y1 = l/dc = 0.8333, for (a) α = 3°, (b) α = 5°, and (c) α = 7°.

Figure 10. Schlieren photograph of the experimental model in position 1, for Ma = 3 and y1 = l/dc = 0.8333, for (a) α = 3°, (b) α = 5°, and (c) α = 7°.

Figure 11. Schlieren photograph of the experimental model in position 2, for Ma = 3 and y2 = l/dc = 1.5201, for (a) α = 3°, (b) α = 5°, and (c) α = 7°.

Figure 11. Schlieren photograph of the experimental model in position 2, for Ma = 3 and y2 = l/dc = 1.5201, for (a) α = 3°, (b) α = 5°, and (c) α = 7°.

Figure 12. Comparison of the drag coefficient for the simulated and experimental results under different conditions.

Note: Ma = 3; y1 = l/dc = 0.8333 for position 1, y2 = l/dc = 1.5201 for position 2.
Figure 12. Comparison of the drag coefficient for the simulated and experimental results under different conditions.

Figure 13. Comparison of the lift coefficient for the simulated and experimental results under different conditions.

Note: Ma = 3; y1 = l/dc = 0.8333 for position 1, y2 = l/dc = 1.5201 for position 2.
Figure 13. Comparison of the lift coefficient for the simulated and experimental results under different conditions.

Figure 14. Comparison of the pitching moment coefficient for the simulated and experimental results under different conditions.

Note: Ma = 3; y1 = l/dc = 0.8333 for position 1, y2 = l/dc = 1.5201 for position 2.
Figure 14. Comparison of the pitching moment coefficient for the simulated and experimental results under different conditions.

Figure 15. Pressure contours of the separation for α = 3° and v0 = 8 m/s at (a) t = 0 ms, (b) t = 10 ms, (c) t = 30 ms, and (d) t = 40 ms.

Figure 15. Pressure contours of the separation for α = 3° and v0 = 8 m/s at (a) t = 0 ms, (b) t = 10 ms, (c) t = 30 ms, and (d) t = 40 ms.

Figure 16. Pressure contours of the separation for α = 7° and v0 = 16 m/s at (a) t = 0 ms, (b) t = 10 ms, (c) t = 30 ms, and (d) t = 40 ms.

Figure 16. Pressure contours of the separation for α = 7° and v0 = 16 m/s at (a) t = 0 ms, (b) t = 10 ms, (c) t = 30 ms, and (d) t = 40 ms.

Figure 17. The process of mesh reconstruction for α = 7° and v0 = 16 m/s at (a) t = 0 ms, (b) t = 10 ms, (c) t = 20 ms, and (d) t = 30 ms.

Figure 17. The process of mesh reconstruction for α = 7° and v0 = 16 m/s at (a) t = 0 ms, (b) t = 10 ms, (c) t = 20 ms, and (d) t = 30 ms.

Figure 18. The surface pressure contours of the submunition for α = 3° and v0 = 8 m/s at (a) t = 0 ms, (b) t = 10 ms, (c) t = 20 ms, and (d) t = 30 ms.

Figure 18. The surface pressure contours of the submunition for α = 3° and v0 = 8 m/s at (a) t = 0 ms, (b) t = 10 ms, (c) t = 20 ms, and (d) t = 30 ms.

Figure 19. The surface pressure contours of the submunition for α = 7° and v0 = 16 m/s at (a) t = 0 ms, (b) t = 10 ms, (c) t = 20 ms, and (d) t = 30 ms.

Figure 19. The surface pressure contours of the submunition for α = 7° and v0 = 16 m/s at (a) t = 0 ms, (b) t = 10 ms, (c) t = 20 ms, and (d) t = 30 ms.

Figure 20. Separation trajectories for (a) α = 3° and v0 = 8 m/s, (b) α = 5° and v0 = 8 m/s, (c) α = 7° and v0 = 8 m/s, (d) α = 3° and v0 = 16 m/s, (e) α = 5° and v0 = 16 m/s, and (f) α = 7° and v0 = 16 m/s.

Figure 20. Separation trajectories for (a) α = 3° and v0 = 8 m/s, (b) α = 5° and v0 = 8 m/s, (c) α = 7° and v0 = 8 m/s, (d) α = 3° and v0 = 16 m/s, (e) α = 5° and v0 = 16 m/s, and (f) α = 7° and v0 = 16 m/s.

Figure 21. Relative velocity in the x direction for the six conditions.

Figure 21. Relative velocity in the x direction for the six conditions.

Figure 22. Relative velocity in the y direction for the six conditions.

Figure 22. Relative velocity in the y direction for the six conditions.

Figure 23. Center of gravity displacement for the six conditions.

Figure 23. Center of gravity displacement for the six conditions.

Figure 24. Angular velocity with time for the six conditions.

Figure 24. Angular velocity with time for the six conditions.

Figure 25. Lift coefficients for the six conditions.

Figure 25. Lift coefficients for the six conditions.

Figure 26. Drag coefficients for the six conditions.

Figure 26. Drag coefficients for the six conditions.