Figures & data
Table 1. Different Simulation calculation cases.
Table 2. Setting of simulation parameters.
Figure 4. The compared pressure gradient along with the riser height y′ in the RCFB between the simulation performed by Wang et al., Citation2020 and the experiment conducted by Zhao et al., Citation2016 (a) upright (θ = 0°), (b) θ = 15°
![Figure 4. The compared pressure gradient along with the riser height y′ in the RCFB between the simulation performed by Wang et al., Citation2020 and the experiment conducted by Zhao et al., Citation2016 (a) upright (θ = 0°), (b) θ = 15°](/cms/asset/ce44b0c2-04f7-42ad-8ef4-4d7d95bed140/tcfm_a_1871417_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. Particle distribution in the riser with different inclined angles of air distribution plate.
![Figure 5. Particle distribution in the riser with different inclined angles of air distribution plate.](/cms/asset/67fa226f-49ec-4061-80d2-ce61eb5052cf/tcfm_a_1871417_f0005_oc.jpg)
Figure 6. Standard deviation in the riser changed with different inclined angles of air distribution plate.
![Figure 6. Standard deviation in the riser changed with different inclined angles of air distribution plate.](/cms/asset/20a78ecc-efc9-4b83-92b9-57fce785bba8/tcfm_a_1871417_f0006_ob.jpg)
Figure 7. Function fitting diagram of air distribution plate inclination angle and riser inclination angle.
![Figure 7. Function fitting diagram of air distribution plate inclination angle and riser inclination angle.](/cms/asset/7dd78870-4c18-4236-b1cd-3e5ecaaae7de/tcfm_a_1871417_f0007_oc.jpg)