Virtual agent-mediated appraisal training: a single case series among Dutch firefighters

Figures & data

Figure 1. Screenshot of the labelling exercise within the training. For publication purposes the content has been edited and translated to English. Additionally, during the labelling exercise the virtual coach is blacked out so as not to make participants uncomfortable or distracted while watching the videos.

Figure 2. Overview of the procedure of the study.

Table 1. Multilevel analyses results of primary outcome measures: number of themes, number of appraisals and word count.

	Number of themes				Number of appraisals				Word count
Model 2	B	SE	df	p	B	SE	df	p	B	SE	df	p
Intercept	2.35	0.28			3.29	0.52			136.51	19.78
Measure number	−0.03	0.04	86	0.48	−0.04	0.09	86	0.62	−4.68*	2.24	87	0.04
Condition	0.99*	0.39	86	0.01	1.51^†	0.81	86	0.07	5.58	20.9	87	0.79
	χ^2(1)	p			χ^2(1)	p			χ^2(1)	p
Model 0 vs. 1	4.37*	0.04			2.65	0.1			8.87**	<0.01
Model 1 vs. 2	6.25*	0.01			3.43	0.06			0.07	0.79

^†p < .1, *p < .05, **p < .01.

Table 2. Multilevel analyses results of primary outcome measures: Processing style and Skill and Confidence scores.

	Conceptual processing				Data-driven processing				Skill and Confidence
Model 2	B	SE	df	p	B	SE	df	p	B	SE	df	p
Intercept	13.97	1.1			8.17	1.48			56.33	6.91
Measure number	−0.15	0.1	87	0.12	0.2	0.19	87	0.31	−0.92	0.65	87	0.16
Condition	1.52	0.92	87	0.1	−2.52	1.81	87	0.17	14.44*	6.14	87	0.02
	χ^2(1)	p			χ^2(1)	p			χ^2(1)	p
Model 0 vs. 1	0.07	0.79			0.06	0.8			0.98	0.32
Model 1 vs. 2	2.7	0.1			1.82	0.17			5.3*	0.02

^†p < .1, *p < .05, **p < .01.

Figure 3. Aggregated data of all participants for number of themes, number of appraisals and number of words written.

Figure 4. Aggregated data of all participants for processing style and Skill and Confidence scores.

Table 3. Multilevel analyses results of secondary outcome measures.

	Positive affect				Negative affect
Model 2	B	SE	df	p	B	SE	df	p
Intercept	18.33	1.82			8.88	1.75
Measure number	−0.49*	0.22	87	0.03	0.03	0.25	87	0.91
Condition	3.75^†	2.12	87	0.08	0.31	2.29	87	0.89
	χ^2(1)	p			χ^2(1)	p
Model 0 vs. 1	1.62	0.2			0.16	0.7
Model 1 vs. 2	3.13^†	0.08			0.02	0.9

^†p < .1, *p < .05.

Figure 5. Aggregated data of Positive affect.

Figure A1. Data of primary outcome measures for individual cases of completers.