19,801
Views
69
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

The effectiveness of narrative exposure therapy: a review, meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis

La efectividad de la terapia de exposición narrativa: una revisión, un metanálisis y un análisis de metarregresión

叙事暴露治疗的有效性:综述,元分析和元回归分析

ORCID Icon, , , &
Article: 1550344 | Received 23 Mar 2018, Accepted 01 Nov 2018, Published online: 25 Mar 2019

Figures & data

Figure 1. Selection of studies. NET, narrative exposure therapy; RCT, randomized controlled trial; ITT, intention-to-treat.

Figure 1. Selection of studies. NET, narrative exposure therapy; RCT, randomized controlled trial; ITT, intention-to-treat.

Table 1. Characteristics of the included studies.

Table 2. Mean effect sizes of narrative exposure therapy (NET) on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression outcomes, in Hedges’ g.

Figure 2. Mean effect sizes of narrative exposure therapy (NET) Hedges’ g [95% confidence interval]. Risk of Bias: A, random sequence generation; B, allocation concealment; C, blinding of participants and personnel; D, blinding of outcome assessment; E, incomplete outcome data; F, selective reporting; G, other bias. Ratings: +, low; ?, unclear; -, high.

Figure 2. Mean effect sizes of narrative exposure therapy (NET) Hedges’ g [95% confidence interval]. Risk of Bias: A, random sequence generation; B, allocation concealment; C, blinding of participants and personnel; D, blinding of outcome assessment; E, incomplete outcome data; F, selective reporting; G, other bias. Ratings: +, low; ?, unclear; -, high.

Table 3. Mean non-controlled effect sizes of the comparators in Hedges’ g (g = 0.02 small; g = 0.05 medium; g = 0.08 large) (Cohen, Citation1992).

Table 4. Meta-regression analyses relating mean age, being female, migration, treatment dose, matching languages, outcome, and therapist’s training to non-controlled effect sizes.