Figures & data
Figure 1. Selection of studies. NET, narrative exposure therapy; RCT, randomized controlled trial; ITT, intention-to-treat.
![Figure 1. Selection of studies. NET, narrative exposure therapy; RCT, randomized controlled trial; ITT, intention-to-treat.](/cms/asset/a6f70f9b-8b43-4400-b4b2-4a6c00abfa76/zept_a_1550344_f0001_b.gif)
Table 1. Characteristics of the included studies.
Table 2. Mean effect sizes of narrative exposure therapy (NET) on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression outcomes, in Hedges’ g.
Figure 2. Mean effect sizes of narrative exposure therapy (NET) Hedges’ g [95% confidence interval]. Risk of Bias: A, random sequence generation; B, allocation concealment; C, blinding of participants and personnel; D, blinding of outcome assessment; E, incomplete outcome data; F, selective reporting; G, other bias. Ratings: +, low; ?, unclear; -, high.
![Figure 2. Mean effect sizes of narrative exposure therapy (NET) Hedges’ g [95% confidence interval]. Risk of Bias: A, random sequence generation; B, allocation concealment; C, blinding of participants and personnel; D, blinding of outcome assessment; E, incomplete outcome data; F, selective reporting; G, other bias. Ratings: +, low; ?, unclear; -, high.](/cms/asset/d2a9860f-25ee-48c5-84cb-156c806e2f3f/zept_a_1550344_f0002_oc.jpg)
Table 3. Mean non-controlled effect sizes of the comparators in Hedges’ g (g = 0.02 small; g = 0.05 medium; g = 0.08 large) (Cohen, Citation1992).
Table 4. Meta-regression analyses relating mean age, being female, migration, treatment dose, matching languages, outcome, and therapist’s training to non-controlled effect sizes.