2,214
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Perspective

‘Re-PEGing’: an endoscopic approach to inadvertent early removal of PEG tube

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 194-198 | Received 03 Oct 2019, Accepted 09 Jan 2020, Published online: 14 Jun 2020

Figures & data

Figure 1. Entake PEG safety system (Commed, Utica, NY). The tube dome is collapsible upon pulling allowing passage of the tube through the gastrocutaneous tract.

Figure 1. Entake PEG safety system (Commed, Utica, NY). The tube dome is collapsible upon pulling allowing passage of the tube through the gastrocutaneous tract.

Figure 2. Gastric wall defect 6 hours after inadvertent removal of PEG tube (white arrow). Note partial sealing of the defect.

Figure 2. Gastric wall defect 6 hours after inadvertent removal of PEG tube (white arrow). Note partial sealing of the defect.

Figure 3. Endoscopic view of double-PEG, placed to improve the apposition and patching of the gastric and abdominal walls.

Figure 3. Endoscopic view of double-PEG, placed to improve the apposition and patching of the gastric and abdominal walls.

Table 1. Clinical data (*indicates time from attempted direct tube replacement [DTR]).