Figures & data
Table 1. Sample size in each group, depending on the effect size (after normalization) and standard deviation, given a power of 80% and α equal to 0.001.
Table 2. Data on healthy individuals (HIs).
Figure 1. Experimental set-ups of variation. The total variation is represented by: (a) the instrumental variation (b) the total technical variation (c) the intrabiological variation and (d) the interbiological variation. The names of the samples are indicated.
![Figure 1. Experimental set-ups of variation. The total variation is represented by: (a) the instrumental variation (b) the total technical variation (c) the intrabiological variation and (d) the interbiological variation. The names of the samples are indicated.](/cms/asset/5bc75640-a406-423f-9578-e9acc50c18b8/zjev_a_1676035_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. Number of master proteins per sample in each variation set-up. Samples Pool_1 until Pool_6 were used for the instrumental variation. The samples HI07_pool_1 until HI07_pool_6 were used to calculate the total technical variation. Samples HI07_B/_C/_F/_H/_K/_M were used to determine the intrabiological variation and HI02/HI03/HI07_M (further called HI07)/HI08/HI10/HI11 for the interbiological variation.
![Figure 2. Number of master proteins per sample in each variation set-up. Samples Pool_1 until Pool_6 were used for the instrumental variation. The samples HI07_pool_1 until HI07_pool_6 were used to calculate the total technical variation. Samples HI07_B/_C/_F/_H/_K/_M were used to determine the intrabiological variation and HI02/HI03/HI07_M (further called HI07)/HI08/HI10/HI11 for the interbiological variation.](/cms/asset/8911f23e-e0e9-4ae6-b7e7-7e4bed56cf4d/zjev_a_1676035_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. Percentage of unique peptides and lipids of the different variation set-ups in the function of the standard deviation (SD) of normalized log intensity. (a) 90% of the least variable peptides of the total variation set-up leads to an SD of 2. (b) The 90% least variable lipids of the total variation set-up do not have an SD that exceeds 1.2.
![Figure 3. Percentage of unique peptides and lipids of the different variation set-ups in the function of the standard deviation (SD) of normalized log intensity. (a) 90% of the least variable peptides of the total variation set-up leads to an SD of 2. (b) The 90% least variable lipids of the total variation set-up do not have an SD that exceeds 1.2.](/cms/asset/ae3a0677-03e0-4254-b9bf-e65e9be171d6/zjev_a_1676035_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. Boxplot of standard deviation (SD) of normalized log intensity of the different variation set-ups. (a) SD of the instrumental, technical, intrabiological and total variation is shown for the proteomic data. (b) SD of the technical, intrabiological and total variation is shown for the lipidomic data.
![Figure 4. Boxplot of standard deviation (SD) of normalized log intensity of the different variation set-ups. (a) SD of the instrumental, technical, intrabiological and total variation is shown for the proteomic data. (b) SD of the technical, intrabiological and total variation is shown for the lipidomic data.](/cms/asset/0ee5ab49-0cdf-4037-bc90-b1ac0046c8e3/zjev_a_1676035_f0004_b.gif)