Figures & data
Table 1. Descriptions of health states of perianal fistula associated with Crohn’s disease used in the survey.
Figure 3. Flow chart of participants.* Total number of Medilead Healthcare Panel registrants. When registering for the panel, a total of 419 people reported that they had visited a medical institution for Crohn’s disease in the past. ** Comprises 419 people registered as having visited a medical institution for Crohn’s disease and 13,190 people randomly selected from the remaining non-Crohn’s disease patients. *** The allocation to the patient or non-patient group was based on the results of the screening survey, not on the information given by people when they registered with the panel. QOL, quality of life; TTO, time trade-off
![Figure 3. Flow chart of participants.* Total number of Medilead Healthcare Panel registrants. When registering for the panel, a total of 419 people reported that they had visited a medical institution for Crohn’s disease in the past. ** Comprises 419 people registered as having visited a medical institution for Crohn’s disease and 13,190 people randomly selected from the remaining non-Crohn’s disease patients. *** The allocation to the patient or non-patient group was based on the results of the screening survey, not on the information given by people when they registered with the panel. QOL, quality of life; TTO, time trade-off](/cms/asset/6e0b22b4-fef9-426f-880e-f323a80b4754/zjma_a_2166374_f0003_b.gif)
Table 2. Background information of valid responders.
Table 3. Utility values in each health state.
Table 4. Utility values based on actual health state at the time of the survey of patients with Crohn’s disease.
Table 5. Results of linear mixed model analysis of utility values.
Supplemental Material
Download Zip (158.5 KB)Data availability statement
We have not acquired an agreement from participants of this study for data to be shared publicly, so supporting data are not available.