1,979
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Listening to music prior to bronchoscopy reduces anxiety – a randomised controlled trial

, , , ORCID Icon, , , & ORCID Icon show all
Article: 1583517 | Received 16 Dec 2018, Accepted 07 Feb 2019, Published online: 17 Mar 2019

Figures & data

Figure 1. Flowchart of the trial (CONSORT flow diagram, www.consort-statement.org).

Figure 1. Flowchart of the trial (CONSORT flow diagram, www.consort-statement.org).

Table 1. Baseline characteristics.

Table 2. Track list for the categories in the group of self-selected music.

Figure 2. Timeline.

BP = blood pressure; HR = heart rate; RR = respiratory rate; SaO2 = oxygen saturation; STAI = Spielberger’s state trait anxiety inventory; VAS = visual analogue scale.

Figure 2. Timeline.BP = blood pressure; HR = heart rate; RR = respiratory rate; SaO2 = oxygen saturation; STAI = Spielberger’s state trait anxiety inventory; VAS = visual analogue scale.

Table 3. Comparison of STAI scores.

Figure 3. Mean difference of STAI state score (Δ-STAI) from admission to 20 min with or without music prior to bronchoscopy.

There was a significant effect of music on change of STAI score from admission to 20 min with or without music [F (2, 297) = 8.68, p < 0.001, ω = .05]. Tukey-adjusted post-hoc comparisons indicated that the change in STAI state score was significant with self-selected music (mean±SD) (−6.3 ± 6.2) compared with that for the control group (no sound) (−2,9 ± 5.1) (p < 0.001; d 0.6). MusiCure™ (−4.6 ± 5.9) did not significantly differ from no music (p = 0.1) nor from self-selected music (p = 0.09) in terms of change in STAI state score.

Figure 3. Mean difference of STAI state score (Δ-STAI) from admission to 20 min with or without music prior to bronchoscopy.There was a significant effect of music on change of STAI score from admission to 20 min with or without music [F (2, 297) = 8.68, p < 0.001, ω = .05]. Tukey-adjusted post-hoc comparisons indicated that the change in STAI state score was significant with self-selected music (mean±SD) (−6.3 ± 6.2) compared with that for the control group (no sound) (−2,9 ± 5.1) (p < 0.001; d 0.6). MusiCure™ (−4.6 ± 5.9) did not significantly differ from no music (p = 0.1) nor from self-selected music (p = 0.09) in terms of change in STAI state score.

Figure 4. Patients overall perception of the sound prior to and during bronchoscopy.

There was a highly significant difference between the music groups and the control group [H (2) = 33.81, p < 0.001]. When analysing the differences between the three treatments, the median VAS score of the control group (median (IQR); 4.5 mm (8.1)) compared with that for the group receiving MusiCure™ (8.3 mm (2.4); p < 0.001) and that of the group receiving self-selected music (8.1 mm (2.9); p < 0.001) was highly significant. No significant difference was found between MusiCure™ and self-selected music (p = 1.0).

Figure 4. Patients overall perception of the sound prior to and during bronchoscopy.There was a highly significant difference between the music groups and the control group [H (2) = 33.81, p < 0.001]. When analysing the differences between the three treatments, the median VAS score of the control group (median (IQR); 4.5 mm (8.1)) compared with that for the group receiving MusiCure™ (8.3 mm (2.4); p < 0.001) and that of the group receiving self-selected music (8.1 mm (2.9); p < 0.001) was highly significant. No significant difference was found between MusiCure™ and self-selected music (p = 1.0).

Figure 5. STAI change from admission to after 20 min with or without music divided by how the patients appreciated the sound measured by VAS.

There is only a significant difference in STAI change in the upper tertile of VAS measuring how patients appreciated the sound. (Kruskal–Wallis test is used because of the very different sizes of the groups).

Figure 5. STAI change from admission to after 20 min with or without music divided by how the patients appreciated the sound measured by VAS.There is only a significant difference in STAI change in the upper tertile of VAS measuring how patients appreciated the sound. (Kruskal–Wallis test is used because of the very different sizes of the groups).