3,228
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Source credibility and plausibility are considered in the validation of textual information: evidence from a social media context

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 183-204 | Received 26 Jan 2022, Accepted 10 Nov 2022, Published online: 23 Nov 2022

Figures & data

Table 1. Overview of all hypothesised effects of Experiment 1 and 2.

Figure 1. Translated example tweets from filler and experimental trials from Experiment 1.

Figure 1. Translated example tweets from filler and experimental trials from Experiment 1.

Table 2. Estimated coefficients, standard errors, degrees of freedom, and t values for the linear mixed model of the reading times in Experiment 1.

Figure 2. Mean reading times with ±1 standard error of Experiment 1 and 2 by experimental condition.

Figure 2. Mean reading times with ±1 standard error of Experiment 1 and 2 by experimental condition.

Table 3. Estimated coefficients, standard errors, degrees of freedom, and t values for the linear mixed model of the plausibility ratings in Experiment 1.

Figure 3. Mean plausibility ratings with ±1 standard error of Experiment 1 and 2 by experimental condition.

Figure 3. Mean plausibility ratings with ±1 standard error of Experiment 1 and 2 by experimental condition.

Figure 4. Mean source credibility ratings with ±1 standard error of Experiment 1 and 2 by experimental condition.

Figure 4. Mean source credibility ratings with ±1 standard error of Experiment 1 and 2 by experimental condition.

Figure 5. Translated example tweets from experimental trials from Experiment 2.

Figure 5. Translated example tweets from experimental trials from Experiment 2.

Table 4. Estimated coefficients, standard errors, degrees of freedom, and t values for the linear mixed model of the reading times in Experiment 2.

Table 5. Estimated coefficients, standard errors, degrees of freedom, and t values for the linear mixed model of the plausibility ratings in Experiment 2.

Data availability statement

The experimental texts, data files, and R-scripts for the full and additional analyses are available (https://osf.io/r5bgx/). The reported experiments were not preregistered.