786
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Shallow subsurface investigations for soil properties at Pedas, Negri Sembilan, Peninsula Malaysia using MASW, ERT,IP, and TEM methods

, , , , ORCID Icon &
Pages 1-11 | Received 12 Feb 2023, Accepted 08 May 2023, Published online: 27 May 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1. Simplified geology of Negeri Sembilan (After Arisona et al. Citation2017) and the layout of the site (lower right).

Figure 1. Simplified geology of Negeri Sembilan (After Arisona et al. Citation2017) and the layout of the site (lower right).

Figure 2. Location map of geophysical field layout adopted in the present work.

Figure 2. Location map of geophysical field layout adopted in the present work.

Table 1. Resistivity values of some subsurface rocks and soil materials (after Keller George and Frischknecht Frank Citation1996).

Table 2. Earth materials and chargeability properties (modified after Murali and Patangay (Citation2006).

Figure 3. Shear wave velocity inversion of line 1 in the study area.

Figure 3. Shear wave velocity inversion of line 1 in the study area.

Figure 4. Shear wave velocity model of line 2 in the study area.

Figure 4. Shear wave velocity model of line 2 in the study area.

Figure 5. Shear wave velocity model of line 3 in the study area.

Figure 5. Shear wave velocity model of line 3 in the study area.

Figure 6. Shear wave velocity depth slice at 5m in the study area.

Figure 6. Shear wave velocity depth slice at 5m in the study area.

Figure 7. Shear wave velocity depth slice at 18.5m in the study area.

Figure 7. Shear wave velocity depth slice at 18.5m in the study area.

Figure 8. Shear wave velocity depth slice at 32.5m in the study area.

Figure 8. Shear wave velocity depth slice at 32.5m in the study area.

Figure 9. 2D resistivity image inverted from the profile 1 data inverted by the RES2DINV program.

Figure 9. 2D resistivity image inverted from the profile 1 data inverted by the RES2DINV program.

Figure 10. 2D resistivity image inverted from the profile 2 data inverted by the RES2DINV program.

Figure 10. 2D resistivity image inverted from the profile 2 data inverted by the RES2DINV program.

Figure 11. 2D resistivity image inverted from the profile 3 data inverted by the RES2DINV program.

Figure 11. 2D resistivity image inverted from the profile 3 data inverted by the RES2DINV program.

Figure 12. Fence diagram for ERT profiles 1 to 3 in the study area.

Figure 12. Fence diagram for ERT profiles 1 to 3 in the study area.

Figure 13. 2D resistivity (above) and chargeability (below) inversion models of the ERT/IP profile 4.

Figure 13. 2D resistivity (above) and chargeability (below) inversion models of the ERT/IP profile 4.

Figure 14. 2D resistivity (above) and chargeability (below) inversion models of the ERT/IP profile 5.

Figure 14. 2D resistivity (above) and chargeability (below) inversion models of the ERT/IP profile 5.

Figure 15. TEM resistivity model in the vicinity of Pedas hot spring.

Figure 15. TEM resistivity model in the vicinity of Pedas hot spring.

Figure 16. Possible two faults according to geophysical measurements of Pedas hot spring.

Figure 16. Possible two faults according to geophysical measurements of Pedas hot spring.