Figures & data
Table 1. Values of the parameters in the Ensemble_all model for each ecosystem.
Figure 1. Comparison of Reco data from Reco_2001_2010_data_set, from Jung et al. (Citation2019) and site observations for major ecosystems; unit: gCm−2d−1.
![Figure 1. Comparison of Reco data from Reco_2001_2010_data_set, from Jung et al. (Citation2019) and site observations for major ecosystems; unit: gCm−2d−1.](/cms/asset/ced29576-7b2c-445b-b0cc-ba8719a6a0b0/tbed_a_1768001_f0001_c.jpg)
Figure 2. Seasonal Reco patterns from Reco_2001_2010_data_set (unit: gCm−2). Spring: March, April and May; Summer: June, July and August; Autumn: September, October and November; Winter: December, January and February. The largest seasonal change occurs in the northern hemisphere.
![Figure 2. Seasonal Reco patterns from Reco_2001_2010_data_set (unit: gCm−2). Spring: March, April and May; Summer: June, July and August; Autumn: September, October and November; Winter: December, January and February. The largest seasonal change occurs in the northern hemisphere.](/cms/asset/7804b693-c5f5-46eb-adec-3555e5500906/tbed_a_1768001_f0002_c.jpg)
Figure 3. Annual ecosystem respiration patterns from Reco_2001_2010_data_set, from process model LPJ_S1 and from Jung et al. (Citation2019) (unit: gCm−2a−1); differences in annual ecosystem respiration patterns between Reco_2001_2010_data_set and Yuan et al. (Yuan et al., Citation2011) (Unit: gCm−2a−1); differences in annual ecosystem respiration patterns between Reco_2001_2010_data_set and LPJ_S1 (Unit: gCm−2a−1); differences in annual ecosystem respiration patterns between Reco_2001_2010_data_set and Jung et al. (Jung et al., Citation2019) (Unit: gCm−2a−1).
![Figure 3. Annual ecosystem respiration patterns from Reco_2001_2010_data_set, from process model LPJ_S1 and from Jung et al. (Citation2019) (unit: gCm−2a−1); differences in annual ecosystem respiration patterns between Reco_2001_2010_data_set and Yuan et al. (Yuan et al., Citation2011) (Unit: gCm−2a−1); differences in annual ecosystem respiration patterns between Reco_2001_2010_data_set and LPJ_S1 (Unit: gCm−2a−1); differences in annual ecosystem respiration patterns between Reco_2001_2010_data_set and Jung et al. (Jung et al., Citation2019) (Unit: gCm−2a−1).](/cms/asset/1a6c7088-3f88-4c88-94a7-c969b963f655/tbed_a_1768001_f0003_c.jpg)
Table 2. The difference between the annual total amount of Reco from Reco_2001_2010_data_set and the flux-measured data at the sites where the difference between the four data sets was the largest (The values in Reco_2001_2010_data_set were closer to the observations than those in the other three data sets (LPJ_S1, Yuan et al. (Citation2011)) and Jung et al. (Citation2019)) were.
Figure 4. Comparison between Reco values for different ecosystems according to the four different data sets (upper); comparisons between the latitudinal distribution of Reco according to the four sources (lower) (negative sign means the North Hemisphere, positive sign means the South Hemisphere).
![Figure 4. Comparison between Reco values for different ecosystems according to the four different data sets (upper); comparisons between the latitudinal distribution of Reco according to the four sources (lower) (negative sign means the North Hemisphere, positive sign means the South Hemisphere).](/cms/asset/24807512-f30d-4e9e-865e-cf435515b933/tbed_a_1768001_f0004_c.jpg)
Data availability statement
The data set is openly available from the Science Data Bank at http://www.dx.doi.org/10.11922/sciencedb.934.