Publication Cover
Mycology
An International Journal on Fungal Biology
Volume 10, 2019 - Issue 4
1,069
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Phylogeny of the subgenus Eumitria in Tanzania

, , , &
Pages 250-260 | Received 18 Apr 2019, Accepted 15 Jun 2019, Published online: 30 Jun 2019

Figures & data

Table 1. Table of Usnea subgenus Eumitria taxa from Africa (Dodge Citation1956; Swinscow and Krog Citation1974, Citation1986; Krog Citation1994) with their main chemistry indicated by X; protocetraric acid (PRO), fumarprotocetraic acid (FUM), diffractaic acid (DIF), salazinic acid (SAL), norstictic acid (NOR), constictic acid (CON), thamnolic acid (THA), psoromic acid (PSO), triterpenoids (TRI), virensic acid (VIR).

Figure 1. Map showing study sites in Tanzania indicated by dots.

Figure 1. Map showing study sites in Tanzania indicated by dots.

Table 2. Species and GenBank accession numbers of sequences used in the DNA analyses. Newly produced sequences in bold.

Figure 2. Consensus tree based on a Bayesian and ML analyses of concatenated ITS, nuLSU, RPB1 and MCM7 showing infrageneric clades in Usnea. The tree was rooted using two species Pleurosticta acetabulum and Lethariella cashmeriana. The two support values associated with each internal branch correspond to posterior probability (PP) and bootstrap support (bs) respectively. Branches in bold indicate a support of PP ≥ 95% and a MLbs ≥ 70%. An asterisk on a bold branch indicates that this node has a support of 100 % for both support estimates. A dash instead of a MLbs value indicates that the node of the Bayesian tree was not recovered by ML bootstrapping. Species groups (within annotation marks) are in accordance with Truong et al (Citation2013). Eumitria is highlighted by a shaded box.

Figure 2. Consensus tree based on a Bayesian and ML analyses of concatenated ITS, nuLSU, RPB1 and MCM7 showing infrageneric clades in Usnea. The tree was rooted using two species Pleurosticta acetabulum and Lethariella cashmeriana. The two support values associated with each internal branch correspond to posterior probability (PP) and bootstrap support (bs) respectively. Branches in bold indicate a support of PP ≥ 95% and a MLbs ≥ 70%. An asterisk on a bold branch indicates that this node has a support of 100 % for both support estimates. A dash instead of a MLbs value indicates that the node of the Bayesian tree was not recovered by ML bootstrapping. Species groups (within annotation marks) are in accordance with Truong et al (Citation2013). Eumitria is highlighted by a shaded box.

Figure 3. Consensus tree based on Bayesian and ML analyses of Eumitria species in Tanzania (ITS, nuLSU, RPB1 & MCM7). The two support values associated with each internal branch correspond to posterior probability (PP) and bootstrap support (bs) respectively. Branches in bold indicate a support of PP ≥ 95% and a MLbs ≥ 70%. An asterisk on a bold branch indicates that this node has a support of 100% for both support estimates. A dash instead of a MLbs value indicates that the node of the Bayesian tree was not recovered by ML bootstrapping. A: America, I: Indonesia, J: Japan, T: Tanzania 1: main chemical substance, 0 accessory chemical substance, x: dark brown pigmentation, big black dots: terete branch shape, triangles: alate branch shape, pentagon: ridged branch shape.

Figure 3. Consensus tree based on Bayesian and ML analyses of Eumitria species in Tanzania (ITS, nuLSU, RPB1 & MCM7). The two support values associated with each internal branch correspond to posterior probability (PP) and bootstrap support (bs) respectively. Branches in bold indicate a support of PP ≥ 95% and a MLbs ≥ 70%. An asterisk on a bold branch indicates that this node has a support of 100% for both support estimates. A dash instead of a MLbs value indicates that the node of the Bayesian tree was not recovered by ML bootstrapping. A: America, I: Indonesia, J: Japan, T: Tanzania 1: main chemical substance, 0 accessory chemical substance, x: dark brown pigmentation, big black dots: terete branch shape, triangles: alate branch shape, pentagon: ridged branch shape.

Figure 4. Usnea baileyi; (a): Usnea baileyi studied specimen (SGT 157), (b): blackish base, (c): soralia with short isidiomorphs (d): thin and shiny cortex, red subcortical pigment and tubular axis filled with loose hyphae.

Figure 4. Usnea baileyi; (a): Usnea baileyi studied specimen (SGT 157), (b): blackish base, (c): soralia with short isidiomorphs (d): thin and shiny cortex, red subcortical pigment and tubular axis filled with loose hyphae.

Figure 5. Usnea pectinata; (a): Usnea pectinata studied specimen (SGT 114), (b): smain branch cylindrical with terete segments, (c): main branch irregular with alate segments, (d): blackish base, (e): soralia with short isidiomorphs, (e): dark brown pigmented axis of main branch with some fistulose areas in the central part of the axis.

Figure 5. Usnea pectinata; (a): Usnea pectinata studied specimen (SGT 114), (b): smain branch cylindrical with terete segments, (c): main branch irregular with alate segments, (d): blackish base, (e): soralia with short isidiomorphs, (e): dark brown pigmented axis of main branch with some fistulose areas in the central part of the axis.

Table 3. Comparison of U. baileyi anatomical characters. Mean (italic), standard deviation and extreme values (in parenthesis) are shown.

Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download Zip (661.8 KB)