Figures & data
Figure 1. CFUs detected from tomato leaflets inoculated with a GFP-expressing strain Amgfp derived from Akanthomyces muscarius IMI 268317. (a) Total CFUs detected from leaf disk inoculated with a conidial suspension drop. (b) Proportion of CFUs detected from washed leaf disk.
![Figure 1. CFUs detected from tomato leaflets inoculated with a GFP-expressing strain Amgfp derived from Akanthomyces muscarius IMI 268317. (a) Total CFUs detected from leaf disk inoculated with a conidial suspension drop. (b) Proportion of CFUs detected from washed leaf disk.](/cms/asset/9d08b8f9-af66-4f94-8517-af22e9bc379e/tmyc_a_1944929_f0001_b.gif)
Figure 2. The number of colonies forming units over time detected on tomato leaflets treated with conidial suspension of 1 × 105 (a) or 1 × 106 (b) conidia/ml of a GFP-expressing strain Amgfp derived from Akanthomyces muscarius IMI 268317. Lines indicate medians.
![Figure 2. The number of colonies forming units over time detected on tomato leaflets treated with conidial suspension of 1 × 105 (a) or 1 × 106 (b) conidia/ml of a GFP-expressing strain Amgfp derived from Akanthomyces muscarius IMI 268317. Lines indicate medians.](/cms/asset/9f4b082a-e016-46f0-8d71-55ef33241aea/tmyc_a_1944929_f0002_b.gif)
Figure 3. Laser scanning confocal microscopy images of epiphytic colonisation of a GFP-expressing strain Amgfp derived from Akanthomyces muscarius IMI 268317 on tomato leaflets. Viable conidia and hyphae were detected on tomato leaflets surfaces (a–d) and cross section (e) at 1 dpi (a), 3 dpi (b and e), 7 dpi (c), and 14 dpi (d). Microcycle conidiation like structures in (b) and phialides with conidia (c and d) were arrowed. Scale bar = 100 µm.
![Figure 3. Laser scanning confocal microscopy images of epiphytic colonisation of a GFP-expressing strain Amgfp derived from Akanthomyces muscarius IMI 268317 on tomato leaflets. Viable conidia and hyphae were detected on tomato leaflets surfaces (a–d) and cross section (e) at 1 dpi (a), 3 dpi (b and e), 7 dpi (c), and 14 dpi (d). Microcycle conidiation like structures in (b) and phialides with conidia (c and d) were arrowed. Scale bar = 100 µm.](/cms/asset/89306639-11f3-46db-993a-0e4a0f696297/tmyc_a_1944929_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. Scanned electron microscopy images of epiphytic colonisation of a GFP-expressing strain Amgfp derived from Akanthomyces muscarius IMI 268317 on tomato leaflets at 1 dpi (a–c), 3 dpi (d, f–i), and 7 dpi (e, j, k). (a–c) ambiguated boundaries between germinated conidia and adjacent conidia or leaf surface, (d) a germ-tube with a conidium on tip, (e) a germ-tube with a conidium adjacent to a tip, and mucilage-like materials around a conidium (arrow), (f) multiple conidia on germ-tube tip, (g) a germ-tube with a swollen tip, (h) a germ-tube with an appressorium-like swollen tip, (i) a germinated conidia with mucilage-like materials (arrow), (j) conidia and elongated hyphae around a trichome, (k) a mass of conidia produced on a tip of a solitary phialide. Scale bar, 5 µm (a–i, k), 10 µm (j).
![Figure 4. Scanned electron microscopy images of epiphytic colonisation of a GFP-expressing strain Amgfp derived from Akanthomyces muscarius IMI 268317 on tomato leaflets at 1 dpi (a–c), 3 dpi (d, f–i), and 7 dpi (e, j, k). (a–c) ambiguated boundaries between germinated conidia and adjacent conidia or leaf surface, (d) a germ-tube with a conidium on tip, (e) a germ-tube with a conidium adjacent to a tip, and mucilage-like materials around a conidium (arrow), (f) multiple conidia on germ-tube tip, (g) a germ-tube with a swollen tip, (h) a germ-tube with an appressorium-like swollen tip, (i) a germinated conidia with mucilage-like materials (arrow), (j) conidia and elongated hyphae around a trichome, (k) a mass of conidia produced on a tip of a solitary phialide. Scale bar, 5 µm (a–i, k), 10 µm (j).](/cms/asset/8c0ff174-328e-4971-b3f4-68673fae493a/tmyc_a_1944929_f0004_oc.jpg)