1,574
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Sub-pixel building area mapping based on synthetic training data and regression-based unmixing using Sentinel-1 and -2 data

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 822-832 | Received 28 Jan 2022, Accepted 04 Jun 2022, Published online: 21 Jun 2022

Figures & data

Table 1. Class hierarchy and number of pure reference samples. Bold: Target classes.

Figure 1. A: Direct and hierarchical regression-based unmixing approach with synthetically mixed training data from a pure surface feature library. STM = Spectral-temporal metrics, imp = impervious surfaces, b = building, nb = non-building impervious surfaces. Building area in (*) was validated. B: Example feature sets for two selected building and non-building impervious surfaces. TCG = Tasselled Cap Greenness, AVG = Average, STD = Standard Deviation, S1 VH AVG = Average Sentinel-1 VH Backscatter.

Figure 1. A: Direct and hierarchical regression-based unmixing approach with synthetically mixed training data from a pure surface feature library. STM = Spectral-temporal metrics, imp = impervious surfaces, b = building, nb = non-building impervious surfaces. Building area in (*) was validated. B: Example feature sets for two selected building and non-building impervious surfaces. TCG = Tasselled Cap Greenness, AVG = Average, STD = Standard Deviation, S1 VH AVG = Average Sentinel-1 VH Backscatter.

Figure 2. Density scatter plots of predicted and reference building area for the direct approach (blue) and the hierarchical approach (green) for 20 m (top), 50 m (centre) and 100 m (bottom) resolutions.

Figure 2. Density scatter plots of predicted and reference building area for the direct approach (blue) and the hierarchical approach (green) for 20 m (top), 50 m (centre) and 100 m (bottom) resolutions.

Figure 3. Density distribution of predicted building area at 10 m spatial resolution, split by pixels occupied by buildings (red) and non-building impervious surfaces (blue) in the three validated federal states.

Figure 3. Density distribution of predicted building area at 10 m spatial resolution, split by pixels occupied by buildings (red) and non-building impervious surfaces (blue) in the three validated federal states.

Figure 4. Predicted building area from the hierarchical approach at 100 m (left) and 10 m (centre) resolution, rasterized reference building footprints (right) for two sites in Berlin (top) and North Rhine-Westphalia (bottom). Scale valid for all subfigures.

Figure 4. Predicted building area from the hierarchical approach at 100 m (left) and 10 m (centre) resolution, rasterized reference building footprints (right) for two sites in Berlin (top) and North Rhine-Westphalia (bottom). Scale valid for all subfigures.