Figures & data
Figure 1. Location of study area in Europe (a) and in the Stubai Valley (b). Land-use pattern for the status quo of the study site ‘Kaserstattalm’ (c).
![Figure 1. Location of study area in Europe (a) and in the Stubai Valley (b). Land-use pattern for the status quo of the study site ‘Kaserstattalm’ (c).](/cms/asset/ac0fb579-0c9a-44c8-ab25-8777158087a3/tbsm_a_751936_o_f0001g.jpg)
Table 1. Mean annual temperature, annual precipitation and summer precipitation (April–September) of the status quo and scenarios for normal and dry years
Table 2. Land-use distribution of the study area ‘Kaserstattalm’ for historical dates, the status quo and the scenarios
Figure 3. Landscape pattern of ecosystem services for the status quo. Values are re-scaled to 0–100. Historical development and future trends in normalized ecosystem services. All scores are normalized by their status quo levels.
![Figure 3. Landscape pattern of ecosystem services for the status quo. Values are re-scaled to 0–100. Historical development and future trends in normalized ecosystem services. All scores are normalized by their status quo levels.](/cms/asset/2b413e03-d1c1-4e44-aaca-a9645922aabc/tbsm_a_751936_o_f0003g.jpg)
Figure 2. Ecosystem services of different land-use types for the status quo. Values are re-scaled to 0–100.
![Figure 2. Ecosystem services of different land-use types for the status quo. Values are re-scaled to 0–100.](/cms/asset/3ed4870d-98da-447d-a2f5-146d997bca28/tbsm_a_751936_o_f0002g.gif)
Table 3. Correlation matrix of PCA for the status quo
Figure 4. Maps of contrasts of (a) the first component and (b) the second component for the status quo.
![Figure 4. Maps of contrasts of (a) the first component and (b) the second component for the status quo.](/cms/asset/a76059ba-1ea6-48ef-a967-2a6da2cab43e/tbsm_a_751936_o_f0004g.gif)