2,599
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Diabetes

The accuracy of a non-invasive glucose monitoring device does not depend on clinical characteristics of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus

, &
Pages 1-7 | Received 09 Aug 2017, Accepted 05 Dec 2017, Published online: 11 Jan 2018

Figures & data

Table 1. Participants' clinical characteristics and the number of paired GlucoTrack-invasive readings.

Figure 1. GlucoTrack non-invasive monitoring device. A. The device includes a main unit and three different sensor pairs, one per each of the three technologies, all located at the tip of a personal ear clip (PEC). B. Illustration of glucose measurement performance using GlucoTrack. The PEC is clipped to the earlobe for spot measurement.

Figure 1. GlucoTrack non-invasive monitoring device. A. The device includes a main unit and three different sensor pairs, one per each of the three technologies, all located at the tip of a personal ear clip (PEC). B. Illustration of glucose measurement performance using GlucoTrack. The PEC is clipped to the earlobe for spot measurement.

Figure 2. Clinical accuracy assessed by CEG as function of A. Diabetes duration, B. HbA1c, and C. Smoking history.

Figure 2. Clinical accuracy assessed by CEG as function of A. Diabetes duration, B. HbA1c, and C. Smoking history.

Figure 3. Numerical accuracy as function of A. Diabetes duration, B. HbA1c, and C. Smoking history: Mean ARD, its model-based upper and lower 95% confidence intervals and median ARD.

Figure 3. Numerical accuracy as function of A. Diabetes duration, B. HbA1c, and C. Smoking history: Mean ARD, its model-based upper and lower 95% confidence intervals and median ARD.