Abstract
Vestibular and ocular motor assessment has gained popularity as a tool for sport-related concussion among healthcare professionals. With awareness of premorbid risk factors, such as attentional problems, it is imperative to understand their effects at baseline. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and diagnosed learning disability (LD) on vestibular and oculomotor baseline concussion assessment in pediatrics. Pediatric athletes between the ages of 8 and 14 years with ADHD/LD (n = 30) and match controls without ADHD/LD (n = 30) completed baseline concussion testing, consisting of symptom provocation on the Vestibular/Ocular Motor Screening (VOMS) and oculomotor performance on near point of convergence (NPC) and King-Devick (K-D) tools. Those diagnosed with ADHD/LD performed worse on baseline saccades (p range = .02–.10), convergence (p = .04), vestibular ocular reflex (VOR) (p = .03) and visual motion sensitivity (VMS) (p = .04) of the VOMS. Base rate analyses revealed that 26% of athletes in the ADHD/LD group had ≥1 and 13.3% had ≥2 VOMS domains over clinical cutoff levels, compared to 3.3% (≥1 domain) and 0 (≥2 domains) of controls. Individuals with ADHD/LD also performed worse on K-D assessment (p = .005). However, no differences were reported on NPC distance (p = .19). These findings suggest worse baseline concussion assessment scores on vestibular/ocular motor assessment domains in pediatric athletes diagnosed with ADHD/LD. Additional research is needed on assessment outcomes to determine if special consideration to those diagnosed with ADHD/LD is warranted.
Presentations
The data herein, has been defended in oral presentation form at the 2018 Big Sky Athletic Training and Sports Medicine Conference, attended by concussion experts, specifically physicians, neurologists, neuropsychologists, and athletic trainers, as well as the 2018 South East Athletic Trainers’ Association (SEATA) Clinical Symposium and 2017 National Athletic Trainers’ Association (NATA) Symposium.
Disclosure statement
No conflicts of interest declared by all authors (RNM, JW, NGM, TC).