5,100
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Reliability modeling of power transformers with maintenance outage

, &
Pages 316-324 | Received 06 Nov 2013, Accepted 04 Mar 2014, Published online: 16 Dec 2014

Figures & data

Figure 1. A typical power transformer showing major components.

Figure 1. A typical power transformer showing major components.

Figure 2. State transition diagram of Group 1.

Figure 2. State transition diagram of Group 1.

Figure 3. State transition diagram of each component in Group 2.

Figure 3. State transition diagram of each component in Group 2.

Figure 4. Series structure in Group 2.

Figure 4. Series structure in Group 2.

Figure 5. Markov state transition diagram of the transformer with maintenance outage.

Figure 5. Markov state transition diagram of the transformer with maintenance outage.

Table 1.  Typical parameter configuration for numerical evaluation.

Figure 6. Probability of full capacity P(E1) vs. windings failure rate multiplier (increased by 10 times).

Figure 6. Probability of full capacity P(E1) vs. windings failure rate multiplier (increased by 10 times).

Figure 7. Probability of zero capacity due to maintenance P(E4) vs. windings failure rate multiplier (increased by 10 times).

Figure 7. Probability of zero capacity due to maintenance P(E4) vs. windings failure rate multiplier (increased by 10 times).

Figure 8. System unavailability U vs. windings failure rate multiplier (increased by 10 times).

Figure 8. System unavailability U vs. windings failure rate multiplier (increased by 10 times).

Figure 9. Probability of full capacity P(E1) vs. proportion factor β.

Figure 9. Probability of full capacity P(E1) vs. proportion factor β.

Figure 10. Probability of derated capacity P(E2) vs. proportion β.

Figure 10. Probability of derated capacity P(E2) vs. proportion β.

Figure 11. System unavailability U vs. proportion factor β.

Figure 11. System unavailability U vs. proportion factor β.

Figure 12. Probability of full capacity P(E1) vs. maintenance rate multiplier (increased by 10 times).

Figure 12. Probability of full capacity P(E1) vs. maintenance rate multiplier (increased by 10 times).

Figure 13. Probability of derated capacity P(E2) vs. maintenance rate multiplier (increased by 10 times).

Figure 13. Probability of derated capacity P(E2) vs. maintenance rate multiplier (increased by 10 times).

Figure 14. Probability of zero capacity due to component down P(E3) vs. maintenance rate multiplier (increased by 10 times).

Figure 14. Probability of zero capacity due to component down P(E3) vs. maintenance rate multiplier (increased by 10 times).

Figure 15. Probability of zero capacity due to maintenance P(E4) vs. maintenance rate multiplier (increased by 10 times).

Figure 15. Probability of zero capacity due to maintenance P(E4) vs. maintenance rate multiplier (increased by 10 times).