1,297
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Game analysis of merchants and consumers confronting fakes on e-commerce platforms

, , , &
Pages 198-208 | Received 28 Apr 2020, Accepted 14 Feb 2021, Published online: 01 Mar 2021

Figures & data

Table 1. Main parameters' symbols and implications of the three-party evolutionary game model.

Table 2. Payoff matrix of the mixed strategy game model among the merchant, e-commerce platform, and consumer.

Figure 1. Phase diagram of the merchant's strategy evolution. It shows the relationship between the merchant's ESS and the probability z. Arrows represent the merchant's strategy choice.

Figure 1. Phase diagram of the merchant's strategy evolution. It shows the relationship between the merchant's ESS and the probability z. Arrows represent the merchant's strategy choice.

Figure 2. Phase diagram of the e-commerce platform's strategy evolution. It shows the relationship between the e-commerce platform's ESS and the probability x. Arrows represent the e-commerce platform's strategy choice.

Figure 2. Phase diagram of the e-commerce platform's strategy evolution. It shows the relationship between the e-commerce platform's ESS and the probability x. Arrows represent the e-commerce platform's strategy choice.

Figure 3. Phase diagram of the consumer's strategy evolution. It shows the relationship between the consumer's ESS and the probability y. Arrows represent the consumer's strategy choice.

Figure 3. Phase diagram of the consumer's strategy evolution. It shows the relationship between the consumer's ESS and the probability y. Arrows represent the consumer's strategy choice.

Table 3. Stability analysis of equilibrium points.

Figure 4. Influence of economic penalty F's changes on x, y, and z. (a) Influence of F's changes on x, y, and z and (b) influence of F's changes on x and y.

Figure 4. Influence of economic penalty F's changes on x, y, and z. (a) Influence of F's changes on x, y, and z and (b) influence of F's changes on x and y.

Figure 5. Influence of supervision cost Cp's changes on probabilities x, y, and z. (a) Influence of Cp's changes on x, y and z and (b) influence of Cp's changes on y with time t.

Figure 5. Influence of supervision cost Cp's changes on probabilities x, y, and z. (a) Influence of Cp's changes on x, y and z and (b) influence of Cp's changes on y with time t.

Figure 6. Influence of economic losses Wm's changes brought by negative online word of mouth on x, y, and z. (a) Influence of Wm's changes on x, y, and z and (b) influence of Wm's changes on x with time t.

Figure 6. Influence of economic losses Wm's changes brought by negative online word of mouth on x, y, and z. (a) Influence of Wm's changes on x, y, and z and (b) influence of Wm's changes on x with time t.

Figure 7. Influence of economic compensation I's changes on probabilities x, y, z. (a) Influence of I's changes on x, y, and z and (b) influence of I's changes on x and z.

Figure 7. Influence of economic compensation I's changes on probabilities x, y, z. (a) Influence of I's changes on x, y, and z and (b) influence of I's changes on x and z.

Figure 8. Influence of economic penalty F's changes on probabilities x and y with time t. (a) Influence of F's changes on x with time and (b) influence of F's changes on y with time.

Figure 8. Influence of economic penalty F's changes on probabilities x and y with time t. (a) Influence of F's changes on x with time and (b) influence of F's changes on y with time.

Figure 9. Influence of supervision cost Cp's changes on the probability y with time t.

Figure 9. Influence of supervision cost Cp's changes on the probability y with time t.

Figure 10. Influence of loss Wm's changes brought by negative online word of mouth on the probability x with time t.

Figure 10. Influence of loss Wm's changes brought by negative online word of mouth on the probability x with time t.