A mixed-methods evaluation of the acceptability and fidelity of the James’ Place model for men experiencing suicidal crisis

Figures & data

Figure 1. Specification of the James’ Place model. Three boxes showing the structure of JPM delivery in three stages each comprised of three sessions, and descriptions of the corresponding focus of each stage and LYCT delivered.

Table 1. Audit scoring scheme.

JPM Component/Delivery Feature Assessed	Number of Points Awarded
Zero DNA’s	1 point
Intervention duration of 6 weeks or less	1 point
8 sessions or less	1 point
Positive outcome (i.e. drop in CORE-OM score)	1 point
Safety plan documented	1 point
No. sets of Lay your Cards on the Table delivered	Maximum no. of points available for delivery of cards = 5
All sets of cards (i.e. 4 sets)	5 points
Three sets of cards	4 points
Two sets of cards	3 points
One set of cards	2 points
No cards delivered	0 points
Maximum score	10 points

Table 2. JP audit results (n = 30).

Duration of Engagement	No. of Sessions	DNA'S	Safety Plan Completed	Positive Outcome	Cards Score	Adherence Score	Secondary Adherence Score	Difference in Adherence Score	Final Adherence score
7	11	0	Yes	Yes	5	8	8	0	8
7	9	0	Yes	Yes	4	7			7
10	8	1	Yes	Yes	5	8			8
15	9	5	Yes	Yes	5	7	7	0	7
13	12	1	Yes	Yes	5	7	7	0	7
8	9	0	Yes	Yes	3	6	6	0	6
10	8	1	No	Yes	0	2			2
12	10	3	No	Yes	3	4	5 (agreed score =  4)	1	4
7	8	1	Yes	No	3	5			5
7	8	2	Yes	Yes	2	5	6 (agreed score = 5)	1	5
10	11	0	Yes	No	5	7	8 (agreed score = 8)	1	8
11	10	0	No	Yes	5	7			7
6	7	0	Yes	Yes	4	9			9
20	16	1	No	Yes	4	5	5	0	5
13	9	0	Yes	Yes	5	8	7 (agreed score = 7)	1	7
11	7	0	Yes	Yes	2	6	5 (agreed score = 5)	1	5
9	8	0	No	Yes	2	5			5
8	7	0	No	Yes	2	5			5
10	9	0	Yes	Yes	2	4			4
6	7	1	Yes	Yes	0	4	4	0	4
13	6	1	No	Yes	0	2	2	0	2
7	9	0	No	Yes	0	2			2
5	8	0	Yes	Yes	0	5			5
8	10	0	Yes	Yes	0	3			3
1	2	0	No	Yes	0	4	4	0	4
3	2	0	Yes	Yes	0	5	4 (agreed score = 5)	1	5
11	7	0	Yes	Yes	4	8			8
11	9	0	Yes	No	4	6			6
4	3	0	Yes	Yes	2	7			7
6	6	0	Yes	Yes	4	9	9	0	9