677
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Short Report

Induction of protective neutralizing antibody responses against botulinum neurotoxin serotype C using plasmid carried by PLGA nanoparticles

, , , , , & show all
Pages 1188-1192 | Received 23 Sep 2015, Accepted 16 Nov 2015, Published online: 22 Mar 2016

Figures & data

Figure 1. (A) Representative dynamic light scattering spectrum of typical PLGA nanoparticles. (B) The size and zeta potential of pVax/Opt-BoNT/C-Hc50-coated cationic PLGA nanoparticles at various nanoparticles to plasmid ratios. Increasing amounts of cationic nanoparticles (0.002–0.08 mg) were mixed with a fixed amount of DNA (1 µg) in equal volumes and allowed to incubate at room temperature for at least 30 min before measuring size and zeta potential. All data reported are mean ± SEM (n = 3).

Figure 1. (A) Representative dynamic light scattering spectrum of typical PLGA nanoparticles. (B) The size and zeta potential of pVax/Opt-BoNT/C-Hc50-coated cationic PLGA nanoparticles at various nanoparticles to plasmid ratios. Increasing amounts of cationic nanoparticles (0.002–0.08 mg) were mixed with a fixed amount of DNA (1 µg) in equal volumes and allowed to incubate at room temperature for at least 30 min before measuring size and zeta potential. All data reported are mean ± SEM (n = 3).

Figure 2. Serum anti-BoNT/C-Hc50 IgG (A), IgG1 (B), and IgG2a(C) induced by intramuscular immunization of mice with pVax/opt-BoNT/C-Hc50 (20 µg/mouse), alone (i.e., pBoNT/C) or coated on cationic PLGA nanoparticles (i.e., pBoNT/C-NPs). SKH-1 Elite mice (n = 5) were dosed in weeks 0, 2, 4 and 8. Control mice received PBS only. Blood samples were collected in week 5 (day 35) and week 9 (day 63). Data are mean ± SD (n = 5). *p < 0.05 compared to Control group,#p < 0.05 compared to pBoNT/C only, and ξp < 0.05, day 35 vs. day 63.

Figure 2. Serum anti-BoNT/C-Hc50 IgG (A), IgG1 (B), and IgG2a(C) induced by intramuscular immunization of mice with pVax/opt-BoNT/C-Hc50 (20 µg/mouse), alone (i.e., pBoNT/C) or coated on cationic PLGA nanoparticles (i.e., pBoNT/C-NPs). SKH-1 Elite mice (n = 5) were dosed in weeks 0, 2, 4 and 8. Control mice received PBS only. Blood samples were collected in week 5 (day 35) and week 9 (day 63). Data are mean ± SD (n = 5). *p < 0.05 compared to Control group,#p < 0.05 compared to pBoNT/C only, and ξp < 0.05, day 35 vs. day 63.

Figure 3. Protective immunity against BoNT/C challenge in immunized mice. SKH-1 Elite mice (n = 5) were dosed in weeks 0, 2, 4 and 8 with pVax/opt-BoNT/C-Hc50 plasmid (20 µg per mouse), alone (i.e., pBoNT/C) or coated on PLGA nanoparticles (i.e., pBoNT/C-NPs), with control mice receiving PBS only, and challenged in week 12 with 100 × MLD50 of BoNT/C toxin.

Figure 3. Protective immunity against BoNT/C challenge in immunized mice. SKH-1 Elite mice (n = 5) were dosed in weeks 0, 2, 4 and 8 with pVax/opt-BoNT/C-Hc50 plasmid (20 µg per mouse), alone (i.e., pBoNT/C) or coated on PLGA nanoparticles (i.e., pBoNT/C-NPs), with control mice receiving PBS only, and challenged in week 12 with 100 × MLD50 of BoNT/C toxin.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.