3,880
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Assessment of the potential public health impact of Herpes Zoster vaccination in Germany

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , , , & show all
Pages 2213-2221 | Received 08 Mar 2017, Accepted 19 Jun 2017, Published online: 21 Sep 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1. Cases avoided with HZ/su vs. No Vaccination and ZVL vs. No Vaccination by Age Cohort: (A) HZ Cases, (B) PHN Cases, (C) Complications HZ/su: herpes zoster subunit; ZVL: Zoster Vaccine Live; HZ: herpes zoster; PHN: postherpetic neuralgia; No Vacc: No Vaccination; yoa: years of age.

Figure 1. Cases avoided with HZ/su vs. No Vaccination and ZVL vs. No Vaccination by Age Cohort: (A) HZ Cases, (B) PHN Cases, (C) Complications HZ/su: herpes zoster subunit; ZVL: Zoster Vaccine Live; HZ: herpes zoster; PHN: postherpetic neuralgia; No Vacc: No Vaccination; yoa: years of age.

Table 1. Public Health impact of both HZ/su and ZVL under base case assumptions of 40% coverage (HZ/su second dose compliance of 70%) over a lifetime horizon from the age of vaccination.

Figure 2. HZ cases avoided with HZ/su vs. No Vaccination and ZVL vs. No Vaccination from the Year of Vaccination by Age Cohort. HZ: herpes zoster; HZ/su: herpes zoster subunit; ZVL: Zoster Vaccine Live. Note incidence is included as an age-specific step function (see ) and this explains the step increases over time, particularly pronounced in the 50–59 y old age group.

Figure 2. HZ cases avoided with HZ/su vs. No Vaccination and ZVL vs. No Vaccination from the Year of Vaccination by Age Cohort. HZ: herpes zoster; HZ/su: herpes zoster subunit; ZVL: Zoster Vaccine Live. Note incidence is included as an age-specific step function (see Table 4) and this explains the step increases over time, particularly pronounced in the 50–59 y old age group.

Table 2. Public health impact scenario analysis assuming a coverage of 40% over a lifetime horizon from the age of vaccination (HZ/su second dose compliance of 50% and 90%).

Table 3. Number needed to vaccinate to prevent one HZ case and one PHN case.

Figure 3. Tornado Diagram: HZ cases avoided with HZ/su compared with ZVL HZ/su: herpes zoster subunit; HZ: herpes zoster. The ranges used for the DSA are detailed in the Table S1.

Figure 3. Tornado Diagram: HZ cases avoided with HZ/su compared with ZVL HZ/su: herpes zoster subunit; HZ: herpes zoster. The ranges used for the DSA are detailed in the Table S1.

Figure 4. Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis: HZ cases avoided with HZ/su compared with ZVL (5,000 simulations). HZ/su: herpes zoster subunit; HZ: herpes zoster. The ranges used for the PSA are detailed in the Table S1.

Figure 4. Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis: HZ cases avoided with HZ/su compared with ZVL (5,000 simulations). HZ/su: herpes zoster subunit; HZ: herpes zoster. The ranges used for the PSA are detailed in the Table S1.

Figure 5. Schematic overview of Markov structure – ZONA model. HZ: herpes zoster; PHN: postherpetic neuralgia.

Figure 5. Schematic overview of Markov structure – ZONA model. HZ: herpes zoster; PHN: postherpetic neuralgia.

Table 4. Base Case Epidemiological inputs.

Table 5. Vaccine efficacy against HZ and PHN.

Figure 6. HZ efficacy waning over time. HZ: herpes zoster; SPS: Shingles Prevention Study; LTPS: Long Term Persistence Study.

Figure 6. HZ efficacy waning over time. HZ: herpes zoster; SPS: Shingles Prevention Study; LTPS: Long Term Persistence Study.

Figure 7. Focus on the Patient.

Figure 7. Focus on the Patient.
Supplemental material

Supplemental_Material.zip

Download Zip (12.3 MB)