Figures & data
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of samples included from 2016 through 2018 (N = 6216)
Figure 2. Proportion of rubella susceptible (IgG negative) individuals among males and females. Error bars represent 99% confidence intervals
![Figure 2. Proportion of rubella susceptible (IgG negative) individuals among males and females. Error bars represent 99% confidence intervals](/cms/asset/a1f83127-c9c7-44b1-806b-277b392b999f/khvi_a_1738834_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. Proportion of rubella susceptible (IgG negative) individuals in each age group among males and females
![Figure 3. Proportion of rubella susceptible (IgG negative) individuals in each age group among males and females](/cms/asset/c5fb732b-3443-41c1-b755-b37f21fe2510/khvi_a_1738834_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. Proportion of rubella susceptible (IgG negative) individuals for each province. Error bars represent 99% confidence intervals
![Figure 4. Proportion of rubella susceptible (IgG negative) individuals for each province. Error bars represent 99% confidence intervals](/cms/asset/9e4da8e6-3242-46f2-88dd-8629c119fbc6/khvi_a_1738834_f0004_oc.jpg)
Figure 5. Proportion of rubella susceptible (IgG negative) individuals by age group. Error bars represent 99% confidence intervals
![Figure 5. Proportion of rubella susceptible (IgG negative) individuals by age group. Error bars represent 99% confidence intervals](/cms/asset/92a43f49-e008-4879-8dab-ff2836b66f4b/khvi_a_1738834_f0005_oc.jpg)
Table 2. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analyses