1,537
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Clinical / Regulatory

The collective voice of early phase COVID-19 vaccine trial participants: Insights for improving confidence in novel vaccines

ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , , & show all
Article: 2203023 | Received 23 Dec 2022, Accepted 03 Apr 2023, Published online: 03 May 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1. Respondents’ motivations for participating in COV001. (a) Respondents’ agreement with statements regarding altruistic and personal motivations. (b) Correlation between participants responses to individual altruistic and personal motivation statements (Kendall’s Tau). (c) Spread of responses to altruistic and personal motivation statements.

Responses to survey statements were coded numerically for analysis: Strongly disagree = −2; disagree = −1; neither agree nor disagree = 0; agree = 1; strongly agree = 2. For violin plot, thick black line inside boxes indicates median, box edges indicate lower and upper quartiles. Violin shape indicates proportion of data around each response.
Figure 1. Respondents’ motivations for participating in COV001. (a) Respondents’ agreement with statements regarding altruistic and personal motivations. (b) Correlation between participants responses to individual altruistic and personal motivation statements (Kendall’s Tau). (c) Spread of responses to altruistic and personal motivation statements.

Box 1. Participants’ comments regarding their motivations for participating in the COV001 vaccine trial.

Figure 2. How participants’ age affected their motivations and concerns about participating in COV001. (a) Younger people (under 25 and 25–34) were more likely to have personal motivations than older people. (b) Younger people (under 25) also reflected higher levels of concern about trial safety.

Data shown as percentages. Significance: Kruskal–Wallis chi-squared test, ** = p < .01, *** = p < .001.
Figure 2. How participants’ age affected their motivations and concerns about participating in COV001. (a) Younger people (under 25 and 25–34) were more likely to have personal motivations than older people. (b) Younger people (under 25) also reflected higher levels of concern about trial safety.

Figure 3. Participants’ perceptions of risk relating to the trial: (a) Proportions of participants in agreement with statements regarding risk of participating in COV001. (b) Participant responses to statements regarding risk of participating in COV001. Responses to survey statements were coded numerically for analysis: strongly disagree = −2; disagree = −1; neither agree nor disagree = 0; agree = 1; strongly agree = 2. For box plot, thick black line indicates median, box edges indicate lower and upper quartiles.

Figure 3. Participants’ perceptions of risk relating to the trial: (a) Proportions of participants in agreement with statements regarding risk of participating in COV001. (b) Participant responses to statements regarding risk of participating in COV001. Responses to survey statements were coded numerically for analysis: strongly disagree = −2; disagree = −1; neither agree nor disagree = 0; agree = 1; strongly agree = 2. For box plot, thick black line indicates median, box edges indicate lower and upper quartiles.

Figure 4. Respondents’ trust in science (a) Respondents’ agreement with statements regarding COVID-19 and science. (b) Spread of responses to statements assessing trust in science.

Responses to survey statements were coded numerically for analysis: Strongly disagree = −2; disagree = −1; neither agree nor disagree = 0; agree = 1; strongly agree = 2. Violin shape indicates proportion of data around each response.
Figure 4. Respondents’ trust in science (a) Respondents’ agreement with statements regarding COVID-19 and science. (b) Spread of responses to statements assessing trust in science.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download PDF (103.6 KB)