Figures & data
Figure 1. Positioning generative tools (LEGO and Analog objects) as a prototyping tool to enable knowledge cycle by using SECI model.
Figure 2. Tasks and arrangements for design jam.
Table 1. Details on the demographics data of the 6 groups
Table 2. Tools and materials given to the participants during the activities
Table 3. Details on experts’ background
Table 4. Sample of experts’ evaluation form for section 1 phase 3, how LEGO and Analogue Objects as prototyping tools contribute to co-creation activities.
Table 5. Sample of experts’ evaluation form for section 2 phase 3, how participants used LEGO and Analogue Objects as prototyping tools in co-creation activities
Table 6. Sample of experts’ evaluation form for section 1 for phase 4, scoring for final output of idea generation
Figure 3. Average score on how prototyping tools contribute to co-creation activities.
Figure 4. average score on how participants used prototypes in co-creation processes
Figure 5. Idea generation scores for each group.
Table 7. Number of ideas produced by each group
Figure 6. Comparing prototyping with LEGO only, Analog Objects only and LEGO-Analog Objects
Table 8. The coding analysis from the focus group interview.
Table 9. Summarizes of the interview analysis on participants reflections of the process.
Figure 7. Rough and incomplete appearance of ideas.
Figure 8. The comparison of approximate amount of LEGO and analog objects used in the co-creation activities to enhance the idea generation in product planning stages.
Figure 9. Comparing low-fidelity and hi-fidelity prototyping with LEGO during co-creation activities.
