1,393
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Synthesis and characterization of silver substituted strontium phosphate silicate apatite using solid-state reaction for osteoregenerative applications

, &
Pages 1111-1125 | Received 25 Nov 2020, Accepted 03 Mar 2021, Published online: 05 Apr 2021

Figures & data

Table 1. Grain size of samples calculated via the Scherrer equation from diffraction data

Figure 1. XRD Pattern of pure phase and silver substituted strontium phosphate silicate samples sintered at 800°C

Figure 1. XRD Pattern of pure phase and silver substituted strontium phosphate silicate samples sintered at 800°C
Figure 1. XRD Pattern of pure phase and silver substituted strontium phosphate silicate samples sintered at 800°C

Figure 1a: Relative peak shift in diffraction data recorded with substitution of silver in samples sintered at 800°C

Figure 1a: Relative peak shift in diffraction data recorded with substitution of silver in samples sintered at 800°C

Figure 2: FTIR spectra of pure phase and silver substituted samples sintered at 800°C showing characteristic peaks and bands

Figure 2: FTIR spectra of pure phase and silver substituted samples sintered at 800°C showing characteristic peaks and bands

Figure 3. SEM Micrographs of (a) pure Phase and (b) silver substituted samples

Figure 3. SEM Micrographs of (a) pure Phase and (b) silver substituted samples

Table 2. Absorbance and hemolytic ratio of pure phase and silver substituted samples calculated with respect to OD values

Figure 4. Optical photographs of the pure phase samples by hemolytic assay

Figure 4. Optical photographs of the pure phase samples by hemolytic assay

Figure 5a: a) Antibacterial effect generated by silver substituted samples over S. aureus calculated via CFU. b) Antibacterial effect generated by silver substituted samples over E. Ccoli calculated via CFU

Figure 5a: a) Antibacterial effect generated by silver substituted samples over S. aureus calculated via CFU. b) Antibacterial effect generated by silver substituted samples over E. Ccoli calculated via CFU

Figure 6. Relative cellular density as observed for different release concentrations of pure phase and silver substituted samples with respect to control

Figure 6. Relative cellular density as observed for different release concentrations of pure phase and silver substituted samples with respect to control

Figure 7. Calculated cell viability as observed for different release concentrations of pure phase and silver substituted samples with respect to control

Figure 7. Calculated cell viability as observed for different release concentrations of pure phase and silver substituted samples with respect to control

Figure 8. X-ray diffraction pattern of 2x silver substituted samples after simulated body fluid immersion

Figure 8. X-ray diffraction pattern of 2x silver substituted samples after simulated body fluid immersion

Figure 9. FT-IR Spectra of 2x silver substituted samples after simulated body fluid immersion

Figure 9. FT-IR Spectra of 2x silver substituted samples after simulated body fluid immersion

Figure 10. SEM Micrographs of 2x silver substituted samples after simulated body fluid immersion. after 7 days of immersion

Figure 10. SEM Micrographs of 2x silver substituted samples after simulated body fluid immersion. after 7 days of immersion