4,331
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Comprehensive analysis of lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA regulatory networks for microbiota-mediated colorectal cancer associated with immune cell infiltration

, , , , , & show all
Pages 3410-3425 | Received 09 Mar 2021, Accepted 05 Jun 2021, Published online: 06 Jul 2021

Figures & data

Figure 1. The flow chart of bioinformatics analysis. Caco-2, human epithelial colorectal adenocarcinoma cells; LGG, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG; B.caccae, Bacteroides caccae; CRC, Colorectal cancer; CR, Colorectum; Fn, Fusobacterium nucleatum; GDC, Genomic Data Commons Data Portal

Figure 1. The flow chart of bioinformatics analysis. Caco-2, human epithelial colorectal adenocarcinoma cells; LGG, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG; B.caccae, Bacteroides caccae; CRC, Colorectal cancer; CR, Colorectum; Fn, Fusobacterium nucleatum; GDC, Genomic Data Commons Data Portal

Table 1. The expression of 8 DEmiRNAs in probiotic environment from TCGA and GEO database

Table 2. The expression of 4 DEmiRNAs in pathogenic environment from TCGA and GEO database

Figure 2. Overview of lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network in probiotics-mediated CRC. Red represents upregulation, and green represents downregulation. LncRNAs, miRNAs, and mRNAs in the networks are represented as diamonds, round rectangles, and circles, respectively. Bar plots show the key RNAs that have the top interaction number in the whole network

Figure 2. Overview of lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network in probiotics-mediated CRC. Red represents upregulation, and green represents downregulation. LncRNAs, miRNAs, and mRNAs in the networks are represented as diamonds, round rectangles, and circles, respectively. Bar plots show the key RNAs that have the top interaction number in the whole network

Figure 3. Overview of lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network in pathobionts-mediated colorectal cancer. Red represents upregulation, and green represents downregulation. LncRNAs, miRNAs, and mRNAs in the networks are represented as diamonds, round rectangles, and circles, respectively. Bar plots show the key RNAs that have the top interaction number in the whole network

Figure 3. Overview of lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network in pathobionts-mediated colorectal cancer. Red represents upregulation, and green represents downregulation. LncRNAs, miRNAs, and mRNAs in the networks are represented as diamonds, round rectangles, and circles, respectively. Bar plots show the key RNAs that have the top interaction number in the whole network

Figure 4. GO functional analysis (a) and KEGG pathway (b) analysis of differentially expressed RNAs in microbiota-mediated colorectal cancer

Figure 4. GO functional analysis (a) and KEGG pathway (b) analysis of differentially expressed RNAs in microbiota-mediated colorectal cancer

Table 3. Univariate and multivariate analysis

Figure 5. Overall survival analysis of RNAs in the ceRNA network of microbiota-mediated colorectal cancer. (a), (b) Kaplan-Meier survival curves of prognostic DELs both in probiotics-mediated ceRNA network and pathobionts-mediated ceRNA network. (c), (d) Kaplan-Meier survival curves of prognostic DELs only in proniotics-mediated ceRNA network

Figure 5. Overall survival analysis of RNAs in the ceRNA network of microbiota-mediated colorectal cancer. (a), (b) Kaplan-Meier survival curves of prognostic DELs both in probiotics-mediated ceRNA network and pathobionts-mediated ceRNA network. (c), (d) Kaplan-Meier survival curves of prognostic DELs only in proniotics-mediated ceRNA network

Figure 6. Protein-protein interaction network of differentially expressed RNAs in microbiota-mediated colorectal cancer, the nodes represent proteins, and the edges demonstrate the predicted functional associations between them, line thickness indicates the strength of data support

Figure 6. Protein-protein interaction network of differentially expressed RNAs in microbiota-mediated colorectal cancer, the nodes represent proteins, and the edges demonstrate the predicted functional associations between them, line thickness indicates the strength of data support

Figure 7. The expressions of 12 hub genes were determined using GEPIA. The expressions of genes are expressed as relative gene expression using transformed log2 (TPM+1) Value (Y-axis) of tumor (red bar) and normal (black bar) samples and displayed as a whisker plot. * p-value <0.05. GEIPIA, gene expression profiling interactive analysis

Figure 7. The expressions of 12 hub genes were determined using GEPIA. The expressions of genes are expressed as relative gene expression using transformed log2 (TPM+1) Value (Y-axis) of tumor (red bar) and normal (black bar) samples and displayed as a whisker plot. * p-value <0.05. GEIPIA, gene expression profiling interactive analysis

Table 4. Results of connectivity map analysis

Figure 8. Three-dimensional diagram of the three most significant candidate drugs. (a) Pentoxyverine (b) Rimexolone (c) Doxylamine

Figure 8. Three-dimensional diagram of the three most significant candidate drugs. (a) Pentoxyverine (b) Rimexolone (c) Doxylamine

Figure 9. Integrative analysis between hub identified signature with humor-infiltrating immune cells

Figure 9. Integrative analysis between hub identified signature with humor-infiltrating immune cells
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download ()

Data availability statement:

The datasets generated during the current study are available in the Gene Expression Omnibus repository: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE79383 and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE122182, and the NCI’s Genomic Data Commons Data Portal: http://portal.gdc.cancer.gov.