Figures & data
![](/cms/asset/3e572376-aff8-4c39-b026-9db01917f357/kbie_a_1996149_uf0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 1. Bodyweight of mice treated orally with BEO
![Figure 1. Bodyweight of mice treated orally with BEO](/cms/asset/61728cae-a6d7-4e1d-a700-f1848c213e6c/kbie_a_1996149_f0001_b.gif)
Figure 2. Effect of topical treatment with BEO (25, 50, 70, and 100%) on multiple-dose skin irritation. A: The skin irritation score of mice after topical application of BEO (25, 50, 70, and 100%). B: Skin sections in the group were treated with (25, 50, 70, and 100%) on day 14. (a) Epidermal thickening, (b) Epidermal thickening with keratinocytes proliferation
![Figure 2. Effect of topical treatment with BEO (25, 50, 70, and 100%) on multiple-dose skin irritation. A: The skin irritation score of mice after topical application of BEO (25, 50, 70, and 100%). B: Skin sections in the group were treated with (25, 50, 70, and 100%) on day 14. (a) Epidermal thickening, (b) Epidermal thickening with keratinocytes proliferation](/cms/asset/b87a14b7-d262-40ef-94e5-dc0c2a278585/kbie_a_1996149_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. Effect of BEO (2.6, 4.4, and 6.1 mg/kg) on a number of writhing movements induced by glacial acetic acid. (a) number of writhing movements in 20 min, (b) Paw grip-strength (gf). Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 10), ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, compared with the model control
![Figure 4. Effect of BEO (2.6, 4.4, and 6.1 mg/kg) on a number of writhing movements induced by glacial acetic acid. (a) number of writhing movements in 20 min, (b) Paw grip-strength (gf). Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 10), ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, compared with the model control](/cms/asset/c7d7fae6-5963-45a2-bb72-3fdbcbcead89/kbie_a_1996149_f0004_b.gif)