2,040
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Uncovering potential single nucleotide polymorphisms, copy number variations and related signaling pathways in primary Sjogren’s syndrome

, , , &
Pages 9313-9331 | Received 13 Sep 2021, Accepted 27 Oct 2021, Published online: 24 Nov 2021

Figures & data

Table 1. Clinical information of enrolled 12 individuals in the WES analysis

Figure 1. Three pSS pedigrees examined in this study

The box and circle represent male and female, respectively. The black color represents individual with pSS. A, B, and Crepresent pedigrees 1, 2, and 3, respectively. W: individual that enrolled for WES analysis.
Figure 1. Three pSS pedigrees examined in this study

Table 2. Common mutation genes between pedigree A, B, and C

Figure 2. Number and functional analysis of mutant genes in pedigree A

A: Venn diagrams of mutations between AI2, AII2, and AII1 individuals. B: top 10 significantly enriched biological processes of mutant genes. C: all significantly enriched signal pathways of mutant genes.
Figure 2. Number and functional analysis of mutant genes in pedigree A

Figure 3. Number and functional analysis of mutant genes in pedigree B

A: Venn diagrams of mutations between BI2 and BII2 individuals. B: top 10 significantly enriched biological processes of mutant genes. C: all significantly enriched signal pathways of mutant genes.
Figure 3. Number and functional analysis of mutant genes in pedigree B

Figure 4. Number and functional analysis of mutant genes in pedigree C

A: Venn diagrams of mutations between CI2 and CII1 individuals. B: all significantly enriched GO terms of mutant genes. C: all significantly enriched signal pathways of mutant genes.
Figure 4. Number and functional analysis of mutant genes in pedigree C

Table 3. Mutation information of FCGBP, ANKRD36C, and FRG2C in the sporadic cases

Figure 5. Common mutations and PPI analysis of mutant genes in 5 sporadic cases

A: Venn diagrams of common mutations. B: Reactome analysis of common mutant genes. C: PPI analysis of common mutant genes.
Figure 5. Common mutations and PPI analysis of mutant genes in 5 sporadic cases

Table 4. Common mutation genes in family patients and sporadic patients

Table 5. Partial pathogenic genes in the CNV deletion regions and involved systemic lupus erythematosus signaling pathway in family A

Table 6. Partial pathogenic genes in the CNV deletion regions in family B

Figure 6. Pathogenic CNVs and functional analysis of involving genes in pedigree A

A: Venn diagrams of pathogenic CNVs between AI2, AII2, and AII1 individuals. B: top 10 significantly enriched biological processes of involving genes in CNVs regions. C: all significantly enriched signal pathways of involving genes in CNVs regions.
Figure 6. Pathogenic CNVs and functional analysis of involving genes in pedigree A

Figure 7. Pathogenic CNVs and functional analysis of involving genes in pedigree B

A: Venn diagrams of pathogenic CNVs between BI2 and BII2 individuals. B: top 10 significantly enriched biological processes of involving genes in CNVs regions. C: all significantly enriched signal pathways of involving genes in CNVs regions.
Figure 7. Pathogenic CNVs and functional analysis of involving genes in pedigree B

Figure 8. Pathogenic CNVs and functional analysis of involving genes in pedigree C

A: Venn diagrams of pathogenic CNVs between CI2 and CII1 individuals. B: top 10 significantly enriched biological processes of involving genes in CNVs regions.C: all significantly enriched signal pathways of involving genes in CNVs regions.
Figure 8. Pathogenic CNVs and functional analysis of involving genes in pedigree C

Figure 9. Venn diagrams of pathogenic CNVs in 5 sporadic cases

Figure 9. Venn diagrams of pathogenic CNVs in 5 sporadic cases

Table 7. 3 GEO datasets of gene expression in pSS

Table 8. CNVs amplification/deletion of 51 immune related genes in 3 pedigrees

Table 9. CNVs amplification/deletion of 51 immune related genes in 5 sporadic cases

Figure 10. GSEA enrichment pathways of differentially expressed genes in both GSE66795 dataset and GSE84844 dataset

A, C, and E respectively represent IL2-STAT5 signaling, interferon-gamma response and interferon-alpha response in GSE66795 dataset. B, D, and F respectively represent IL2-STAT5 signaling, interferon-gamma response and interferon-alpha response in GSE84844 dataset.
Figure 10. GSEA enrichment pathways of differentially expressed genes in both GSE66795 dataset and GSE84844 dataset

Figure 11. Sanger validation results of ZNF180 variant in 4 patients in 3 pedigrees and 2 sporadic patients. Red base represents the mutation site

Figure 11. Sanger validation results of ZNF180 variant in 4 patients in 3 pedigrees and 2 sporadic patients. Red base represents the mutation site

Figure 12. Sanger validation results of FCGBP variant in 4 patients in 3 pedigrees and 5 sporadic patients. Red base represents the mutation site

Figure 12. Sanger validation results of FCGBP variant in 4 patients in 3 pedigrees and 5 sporadic patients. Red base represents the mutation site

Figure 13. Sanger validation results of FRG2C variant in 4 patients in 3 pedigrees and 5 sporadic patients. Red base represents the mutation site

Figure 13. Sanger validation results of FRG2C variant in 4 patients in 3 pedigrees and 5 sporadic patients. Red base represents the mutation site

Figure 14. The in vitro validation of SSB, BATF2, BATF3, PARP9, IL15RA, and LAP3 in pSS

Figure 14. The in vitro validation of SSB, BATF2, BATF3, PARP9, IL15RA, and LAP3 in pSS
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Excel (19.9 KB)

Data availability statement

All data are available in the article.