Figures & data
Table 1. Sequences of primers used in qRT-PCR
Figure 1. DSCAM-AS1 was upregulated in pancreatic cancer. (a) IHC assay of DSCAM-AS1 in tumor tissues. ×400, scale bar = 50 μm. (b and c) DSCAM-AS1 level in tumor tissues (n = 30) (b) and cancer cell lines (c).
![Figure 1. DSCAM-AS1 was upregulated in pancreatic cancer. (a) IHC assay of DSCAM-AS1 in tumor tissues. ×400, scale bar = 50 μm. (b and c) DSCAM-AS1 level in tumor tissues (n = 30) (b) and cancer cell lines (c).](/cms/asset/df0a7655-35a3-46ac-b34b-b8a611aff673/kbie_a_2016326_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. DSCAM-AS1 inhibition efficiently prevented pancreatic cancer progression in vitro. PANC-1 cells were transfected with two siRNAs targeting DSCAM-AS1. (a) DSCAM-AS1 level. (b) CCK-8 assay. (c) Colony formation assay. (d) Migration assay. (e) Invasion assay. ×200, scale bar = 100 μm. ** p < 0.01 vs. si-NC.
![Figure 2. DSCAM-AS1 inhibition efficiently prevented pancreatic cancer progression in vitro. PANC-1 cells were transfected with two siRNAs targeting DSCAM-AS1. (a) DSCAM-AS1 level. (b) CCK-8 assay. (c) Colony formation assay. (d) Migration assay. (e) Invasion assay. ×200, scale bar = 100 μm. ** p < 0.01 vs. si-NC.](/cms/asset/2098c757-70d8-4c0a-a28e-751fd0200e5b/kbie_a_2016326_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. DSCAM-AS1 knockdown inhibited tumor growth in vivo. (a) DSCAM-AS1 level in tumor tissues by qRT-PCR. (b) Representative tumor images. (c) Tumor volume. (d) Tumor weight. (e) MiR-136-5p and PBX3 levels in tumor tissues by qRT-PCR. (f) PBX3 level in tumor tissues. (g) Ki-67 levels in tumor tissues by IHC staining assay. ×200, scale bar = 100 μm.
![Figure 3. DSCAM-AS1 knockdown inhibited tumor growth in vivo. (a) DSCAM-AS1 level in tumor tissues by qRT-PCR. (b) Representative tumor images. (c) Tumor volume. (d) Tumor weight. (e) MiR-136-5p and PBX3 levels in tumor tissues by qRT-PCR. (f) PBX3 level in tumor tissues. (g) Ki-67 levels in tumor tissues by IHC staining assay. ×200, scale bar = 100 μm.](/cms/asset/9ac50bfb-4a40-47e6-b175-a050b050fa4a/kbie_a_2016326_f0003_oc.jpg)
Figure 4. DSCAM-AS1 directly bound to miR-136-5p. (a) The transfection efficiency of miR-136-5p mimics or inhibitor was confirmed. (b) The putative interaction between DSCAM-AS1 and miR-136-5p by Starbase. (c) Luciferase reporter assay. (d) PNAC-1 cells were transfected with si-DSCAM-AS1-1 and si-DSCAM-AS1-1, and miR-136-5p expression was evaluated. (e) DSCAM-AS1 level in PNAC-1 cells after transfection with miR-136-5p mimics or inhibitor. (f) MiR-136-5p level in tumor tissues. (g) The correlation between DSCAM-AS1 and miR-136-5p levels in tumor tissues.
![Figure 4. DSCAM-AS1 directly bound to miR-136-5p. (a) The transfection efficiency of miR-136-5p mimics or inhibitor was confirmed. (b) The putative interaction between DSCAM-AS1 and miR-136-5p by Starbase. (c) Luciferase reporter assay. (d) PNAC-1 cells were transfected with si-DSCAM-AS1-1 and si-DSCAM-AS1-1, and miR-136-5p expression was evaluated. (e) DSCAM-AS1 level in PNAC-1 cells after transfection with miR-136-5p mimics or inhibitor. (f) MiR-136-5p level in tumor tissues. (g) The correlation between DSCAM-AS1 and miR-136-5p levels in tumor tissues.](/cms/asset/c90ca3ec-99a5-4876-a544-c9d71f279fb3/kbie_a_2016326_f0004_b.gif)
Figure 5. MiR-136-5p mimics inhibited pancreatic cancer progression, possibly via PBX3 in vitro. (a) CCK-8 assay. (b) Colony formation assay. (c) Migration assay. (d) Invasion assay. (e) The putative interaction between miR-136-5p and PBX3 by Starbase. (f) Luciferase reporter assay. (g) The transfection efficiency of DSCAM-AS1 overexpressing vector. (h and i) PBX3 level by qRT-PCR (h) and Western blot (i). (j) PBX3 level in PANC-1 cells by immunofluorescence. ×200, scale bar = 100 μm.
![Figure 5. MiR-136-5p mimics inhibited pancreatic cancer progression, possibly via PBX3 in vitro. (a) CCK-8 assay. (b) Colony formation assay. (c) Migration assay. (d) Invasion assay. (e) The putative interaction between miR-136-5p and PBX3 by Starbase. (f) Luciferase reporter assay. (g) The transfection efficiency of DSCAM-AS1 overexpressing vector. (h and i) PBX3 level by qRT-PCR (h) and Western blot (i). (j) PBX3 level in PANC-1 cells by immunofluorescence. ×200, scale bar = 100 μm.](/cms/asset/8d9e5a8a-7b08-49d0-9504-18cf49e53d85/kbie_a_2016326_f0005_oc.jpg)
Figure 6. MiR-136-5p mediated the impact of DSCAM-AS1 in pancreatic cancer cells in vitro. (a) DSCAM-AS1 level by qRT-PCR. (b) CCK-8 assay. (c) Colony formation assay. (d) Migration assay. (e) Invasion assay. ×200, scale bar = 100 μm.
![Figure 6. MiR-136-5p mediated the impact of DSCAM-AS1 in pancreatic cancer cells in vitro. (a) DSCAM-AS1 level by qRT-PCR. (b) CCK-8 assay. (c) Colony formation assay. (d) Migration assay. (e) Invasion assay. ×200, scale bar = 100 μm.](/cms/asset/05b7749f-5276-4b25-bd45-649933896b97/kbie_a_2016326_f0006_oc.jpg)
Figure 7. DSCAM-AS1 regulated pancreatic cancer progression via modulating PBX3. (a and b) The transfection efficiency by qRT-PCR (a) and Western blot (b). (c and d) PBX3 level by qRT-PCR (c) and Western blot (d). (e) CCK-8 assay. (f) Colony formation assay. (g) Migration assay. (h) Invasion assay. ×200, scale bar = 100 μm.
![Figure 7. DSCAM-AS1 regulated pancreatic cancer progression via modulating PBX3. (a and b) The transfection efficiency by qRT-PCR (a) and Western blot (b). (c and d) PBX3 level by qRT-PCR (c) and Western blot (d). (e) CCK-8 assay. (f) Colony formation assay. (g) Migration assay. (h) Invasion assay. ×200, scale bar = 100 μm.](/cms/asset/524635b3-6ed3-48ee-b0ee-6cd13b447a66/kbie_a_2016326_f0007_oc.jpg)