2,020
Views
20
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Report

Dramatic reduction of void swelling by helium in ion-irradiated high purity α-iron

, , , &
Pages 372-377 | Received 13 Jan 2018, Published online: 11 Apr 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1. SRIM calculations of displacement damage, helium concentration and injected self-ion concentration depth profile for Fe matrix.

Figure 1. SRIM calculations of displacement damage, helium concentration and injected self-ion concentration depth profile for Fe matrix.

Figure 2. BF TEM images of cavities in α-Fe when (a) helium was co-implanted to 17 appm He/dpa at damage peak and (b) without helium co-implantation. Imaging was performed exactly on (001) zone axis, as evidenced by the diffraction patterns shown as insets. (c), (d). TEM images of depth distribution of cavities with and without helium co-implantation respectively, imaged far away from diffraction conditions. (under-focus = −1136 nm).

Figure 2. BF TEM images of cavities in α-Fe when (a) helium was co-implanted to 17 appm He/dpa at damage peak and (b) without helium co-implantation. Imaging was performed exactly on (001) zone axis, as evidenced by the diffraction patterns shown as insets. (c), (d). TEM images of depth distribution of cavities with and without helium co-implantation respectively, imaged far away from diffraction conditions. (under-focus = −1136 nm).

Figure 3. Depth distribution of (a) void swelling (b) average cavity size and (c) number density in α-Fe irradiated at 773 K, without and with co-implantation of helium.

Figure 3. Depth distribution of (a) void swelling (b) average cavity size and (c) number density in α-Fe irradiated at 773 K, without and with co-implantation of helium.

Figure 4. Depth variation of cavity sink strength in the irradiated α-Fe.

Figure 4. Depth variation of cavity sink strength in the irradiated α-Fe.
Supplemental material

Supplementary_Data.docx

Download MS Word (693 KB)